OUR CAREER-LIMITING ADDICTION TO CERTAINTY: Why Some Leadership Decisions Stay Stuck

(LISTEN TO NARRATED AUDIOARTICLE VERSION)

Are you waiting for information you can’t possibly obtain? I don't mean that you're looking in the wrong place. I’m talking about information you’re waiting for that literally does not yet exist.

That may sound strange, but I see it regularly in my executive coaching work with leaders. The decision might involve any number of challenging scenarios: a strategic shift, a career move, a difficult conversation, an investment in a new opportunity. The details vary, but the pattern is remarkably consistent: a leader wants more information, clearer insight, and greater confidence that the decision will work out as they intend. On the surface, that sounds sensible. And most of us would prefer thoughtful leaders to impulsive ones.

The challenge, however, is one of diminishing returns: some decisions eventually reach a point where additional thinking stops producing additional clarity. The facts have been gathered, the options have been explored, trusted people have offered their perspectives, and the risks are reasonably well understood. But there it sits, parked, waiting for... what?

In my executive coaching work with leaders, I've noticed that people rarely get stuck because they haven't thought enough. By the time they're talking to me, they've usually considered their situation from every conceivable angle. They've researched, talked it through with trusted colleagues, slept on it, revisited it, and probably had the conversation with themselves a dozen times.

But something often goes unnoticed: the quest for information that belongs to a future chapter of the story. They assume that if they think a little deeper, analyze a little harder, or wait a little longer, the missing piece will eventually appear. Sometimes it does, and sometimes the information they're looking for can only emerge after action begins.

I was reminded of this recently while speaking with a client who was considering a significant career move. She had done her homework thoroughly. She understood the opportunity, the risks, and the trade-offs involved. She had spoken with people she respected and spent considerable time reflecting on the decision. At one point, she made a joke about it and said she was waiting for the universe to send her a registered letter confirming she was making the right choice. The image made us both smile because it captured the situation, and her wiring, perfectly. (Sometimes, clients come up with the perfect metaphor on their own.)

She wasn't avoiding the decision or being careless. She had simply reached the point where further analysis was unlikely to produce anything meaningfully new. The information she wanted was on the other side of the decision, the result of experiencing it firsthand.

Many leadership decisions eventually arrive at this point. More analysis feels productive because analysis has served us well throughout our careers. Gathering information is often the right response to uncertainty. The difficulty comes when we continue gathering long after we've exhausted what the current chapter can teach us.

Ronald Heifetz's work on Adaptive Leadership offers a useful distinction here. Technical problems can often be solved through expertise and existing knowledge. Adaptive challenges are different. They require learning, experimentation, and movement into territory where important answers emerge only after action has begun.

Senior leaders encounter these challenges constantly. Markets change. Technologies reshape industries. Customer expectations evolve. Business models that once seemed stable begin to shift. In situations like these, leaders often keep searching for information that nobody has access to yet. Not the board. Not the consultants. Not the person with twenty years of industry experience.

Reality is frustrating that way. It tends to hold onto certain information until somebody actually does something. Leaders who would never describe themselves as risk-averse can find themselves waiting for reassurance that cannot be obtained ahead of time. The decision remains under review, another meeting gets scheduled, another discussion takes place, and the future remains politely on hold.

Meanwhile, reality keeps moving. Competitors make decisions, employees draw conclusions, and opportunities evolve. More importantly, new information appears when somebody tests an idea, enters a market, has a conversation, launches a project, accepts a role, or declines one. Action reveals things that analysis cannot.

That's why people who move sometimes appear to have better information than everyone else. In many cases, they created it. I’m not advising recklessness or abandoning thoughtful analysis. Good leaders should examine assumptions, consider consequences, and seek wise counsel. The challenge is recognising when analysis has delivered everything it can reasonably provide. Many important leadership decisions don't begin with certainty. They begin with a willingness to learn.

My client eventually made her move. What struck me afterwards wasn't whether the decision worked out. It was how little new information appeared between the moment she felt stuck and the moment she finally acted. The certainty she had been waiting for never arrived. What arrived was the next chapter of information. Once she stepped into the experience, she began learning things that had been impossible to know beforehand. Those insights had never been available to her while she was standing still.

That realization has stayed with me because it applies to far more than career decisions. Some of the information we want most is unavailable until we begin moving toward it.

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE

• Think about a decision you've been carrying for a while.

• Write down the information you believe you still need before acting. Then write down what information could only become available after you take action.

• As you compare the two lists, notice whether you've been waiting for information that genuinely exists or information that belongs to a future chapter of the story.

• If certainty never arrives, what decision would you make based on what you already know?

• Sit with that question for a few minutes and notice what emerges.

Reach out for a free exploratory Executive Coaching conversation at www.leslierohonczy.com.

WHY STRAIGHT TALK FEELS RISKY: The Cost of Safe Language

(LISTEN TO THE NARRATED AUDIOARTICLE VERSION)

A DECISION THAT NEVER ACTUALLY GETS MADE

You walk out of the meeting knowing that you and your colleagues have just spent ninety minutes talking intelligently about something that still hasn’t been decided.

Everyone contributes. The conversation is thoughtful and measured. People ask good questions, they share competing perspectives, and acknowledge differing opinions. There’s nuance, context, and carefully chosen language designed to signal openness and respect.

And yet, when the meeting ends, there’s no clear owner, no visible decision, and no shared understanding of what should move forward versus what remains under consideration. In other words, no one is sure what happens next.

The energy in the room isn’t tense or dysfunctional; it’s polite, competent, and professional. It’s also oddly unresolved, as if the big, important thing is hovering overhead, just out of reach, and unnamed. People leave with their notes and impressions, and often their assumptions begin to diverge the moment they leave the meeting.

Most of us recognize this moment immediately because it appears everywhere, in meetings at work, around family tables, and within long-standing friendships. We care about the people we’re talking with, and we care what they think about us and our perspectives. That’s just human nature, and it shapes how we choose our words. It feels like choosing careful language is a kindness, a way of being respectful and considerate. And sometimes it is.

The problem starts when careful language replaces clear, shared understanding. What feels risky in those moments isn’t actually the wording itself; it’s the exposure of our real opinions and priorities to the judgment of others, especially when relationships, reputation, or future influence feels at stake. When we avoid that exposure and tell ourselves we’re doing it out of care, the real cost shows up as eroding trust, slower decisions, and a lack of clarity that leaves others guessing where we actually stand.

HOW SAFE LANGUAGE BECOMES THE DEFAULT

We don’t end up in careful, polite conversations that never quite land because we’re timid or unclear thinkers. We arrive here through experience, because over time, we've watched words travel. We've seen them land in the moment, then move through emails, meetings, and retellings, and eventually come back sounding slightly different than what we intended. We’ve seen sentences lifted out of context, replayed in hallways, or forwarded with altered meanings, so we learn that showing our real views, preferences, and positions can feel risky, not because words are dangerous, but because being seen clearly can be.

Over time, we begin cushioning what we say. We add qualifiers; we soften edges; we leave doors open, just in case. And we choose language that signals caution rather than decisiveness.

In coaching conversations, I often hear this described as trying to be careful, not wanting to shut anything down, or wanting to leave room for input. Underneath that language is something more human and more uncomfortable to name: a desire to avoid being judged, misunderstood, or seen in a poor light, and a hope that by softening our words we can protect both other people’s feelings and our own credibility.

Safe language becomes a way for us to try to keep the peace, avoid awkward moments or pushback, and give ourselves some room to manoeuvre when things feel complicated. It feels responsible, especially when the stakes are high and the audience is broad. The trouble starts when this way of speaking becomes the default rather than a deliberate choice.

WHEN PROTECTION BECOMES A PROBLEM

At a certain point, the very language designed to protect us from exposure begins to create its own problems.

Decisions slow down. Ownership becomes fuzzy. Teams start doing interpretation work, trying to read between the lines to figure out what their leader actually means.

I write about a standout moment like this in my book Coaching Life, in chapter 19 on authenticity. I remember watching a senior leader in action at a large leadership meeting, and he was spectacular. As the chief executive officer and other executives presented their strategy, he calmly stood up from the audience, took the microphone, and stepped into what felt like a real danger zone to share his view of the progress they had made so far. His assessment was quite different from the prevailing stance in the room.

He didn’t posture or perform. He challenged their thinking respectfully but boldly, naming what wasn’t working and where they needed to do better. I remember sitting there, along with more than two hundred other leaders, completely gobsmacked by what we were witnessing.

Many of us interpreted that moment as bravery, and it was. But what struck me more deeply was how grounded he was in his convictions, and how willing he was to let others see where he actually stood. He spoke truth to power in a high-stakes forum, not to provoke, but because he believed it mattered.

His insights and opinions that day changed the course of several initiatives, and reprioritised the work in ways that helped the organisation regain focus and move forward. Within two years, he was promoted to a senior executive role, and later invited to step in as the acting chief executive officer during a leadership transition. That moment stayed with me because it showed the other side of the story. Straight talk can feel risky, but when it’s rooted in conviction and clarity, it can also build trust, momentum, and credibility in ways that careful language never will.

WHY THIS GETS HARDER WITH SENIORITY

As roles become more senior, straight talk can start to feel riskier, not because people lose confidence or capability, but because being seen clearly carries broader consequences.

At higher levels, there are more stakeholders to consider, more political dynamics to navigate, and more ripple effects that can’t be fully predicted, which means a single, clearly stated view is more likely to be interpreted, repeated, and acted on in ways that extend far beyond the original moment. We’ve all seen an executive make an offhand remark or ask a curious question, only to watch that comment turn into a full-blown project, when all they were really doing was thinking out loud. A single sentence can land very differently depending on who hears it and when.

At more senior levels, it's easy to confuse diplomacy with ambiguity and kindness with vagueness, because we're holding more than our own reputation. We're holding relationships, culture, and momentum along with it.

Straight talk begins to feel like something that might cost too much, because it can ask us to be seen more clearly than we’re quite comfortable with.

What often goes unspoken is that people can feel that hesitation, even when they can’t quite name it. They sense when their leader is circling around their real point of view rather than naming it directly. Over time, that gap erodes confidence, not only in the leader and their willingness to stand behind a clear position, but also in the team's confidence in their own judgment, and in the organization itself.

WHAT STRAIGHT TALK REQUIRES IN PRACTICE

I want to be clear about something here, because straight talk is not an abstract idea for me, nor is it optional in my work. As an executive coach, choosing clarity over comfort is part of the job. Speaking truth to power, naming what I see, and surfacing what others are often thinking but not saying isn't a stretch goal or nice to have; it’s a professional responsibility.

That doesn’t mean it’s effortless, or that there’s no judgment to navigate. It means I’ve learned that avoiding discomfort in the moment usually creates more discomfort later, for clients, teams, and systems that are already carrying too much ambiguity.

What this looks like in practice is a commitment to clarity over comfort. It means naming the real issue rather than circling it, being precise about what I see rather than over‑framing it, and resisting the urge to soften edges in ways that cloud new awareness or slow movement. It means trusting that people are more capable of handling clarity than we sometimes give them credit for, and remembering that avoiding discomfort in the moment usually creates more work later.

Those questions matter because straight talk, when it's done well, isn’t about provocation or bravado. It’s about respecting people enough to trust that they can handle clarity and candour. It’s about being willing to stand behind what you see and say, even when it creates a moment of discomfort. That’s the kind of visibility this work requires, and it’s the standard I hold myself to.

RECLAIMING STRAIGHT TALK

Straight talk isn’t harshness, oversharing, or saying everything that crosses your mind. It’s a willingness to let others see where you actually stand, in language that makes decisions clearer and action easier. It’s language that encourages movement. It reduces the invisible labour of interpretation that teams are so often left to carry. It names decisions without posturing and sets direction without shutting people down. The real work isn’t abandoning care, but noticing when care has turned into avoidance.

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE

Before your next important conversation, pause and ask yourself this:

Where might my careful language be helping, and where might it now be getting in the way of clarity?

Then choose one situation where you will experiment with being a little more visible than usual. Name what you actually think. Be clear about what you are seeing, what you believe and why it matters, or what you think needs to happen next. Notice the urge to soften or over‑explain, and see what happens when you allow yourself to resist it. You don’t need to be blunt or provocative. You just need to be clear enough that others don’t have to guess where you stand.

As you experiment with this, notice three specific things:

1. How the conversation changes, for example, whether it becomes more focused or less tense

2. The impact on decision-making, such as clearer ownership or more explicit next steps

3. How people respond to you, including whether they ask fewer follow-up questions because your position is easier to understand

Once you’ve noticed these patterns, use your observations as data that will guide how and when you choose to be more visible in future conversations, especially in moments where you might normally default to caution.

If you'd like to explore the skill of straight talk in the context of your own leadership evolution, reach out for a free exploratory Executive Coaching conversation at www.leslierohonczy.com

I BELONG HERE: Build Confidence by Shifting from 'Guest' To 'Host'

Your heart is racing, your palms are clammy, and all the right words seem to be missing in action. Sitting at a table full of senior leaders, waiting for your turn to speak, you feel like a guest at a fancy party: not quite dressed for the occasion, unsure if anyone knows your name, polite and tentative, careful not to spill the wine. All the while, that familiar whisper rises inside you: Do I belong here?

We all know this moment. I’ve coached many executives and senior leaders who’ve felt it too. The irony is that it shows up most often when we’ve already earned our seat: we got the promotion, the board role, the invitation to join the executive table. What's with that?

The bad news: that whisper may never fully go away.
The good news: you get to decide how to respond to it.

FROM GUEST TO HOST

That feeling of belonging doesn’t come from a title, a business card, or a corner office. It’s shaped by your stance at the table, built through the contributions you make once you’re there. Ask yourself in those moments: "Am I showing up as a guest, or as a host?"

I used these powerful metaphors with an executive I coached, who was recently promoted to the Executive team, and who was working on building her confidence. In her first few months, she rarely spoke up. She waited to be asked for her input, believing that restraint would signal professionalism. Instead, her peers interpreted her silence as disengagement or aloofness.

Things began to shift when she started observing herself in action, specifically looking for how she was showing up as a guest, and then intentionally stepping into the role of a host. A guest is tentative, waiting to be invited, careful not to impose. Guests are polite and reactive, hoping not to stand out for the wrong reasons. By contrast, a host sets the tone, sparks conversation, and takes responsibility for creating an experience where everyone feels included. When she began preparing a few thoughtful contributions before executive meetings, she was no longer just occupying a seat. She was shaping the conversation and beginning the shift from guest energy to host energy, and towards her aspirational future state as an executive.

THE CURRENCY OF CONTRIBUTION

Think about the difference between passively taking a seat and actively shaping the table. Holding back, being overly careful about overstepping, or waiting for an invitation can keep us small and safe, but it also keeps us from having real influence.

Leaders who thrive step into their host energy. They don’t just sit at the table, they set it. They frame the conversation, draw others in, and make sure the best ideas get amplified. Hosting isn’t about control, it’s about responsibility. Hosts don’t wait to be asked, they create the conditions where others can flourish.

And here’s the twist: once you step into host energy, belonging stops being only about you. You start generating it for others. When you model confidence, welcome diverse voices, courageously challenge, and guide dialogue with intention, you create a ripple effect of belonging that strengthens the entire room.

FROM WHISPER TO BELONGING

That whisper of “Do I belong here?” probably won’t disappear. But the answer doesn’t come from waiting for reassurance or hoping someone else will validate you. It comes from practice: showing up prepared, contributing consistently, and daring to claim your space. Each time you step into host energy rather than guest energy, you strengthen your confidence and reshape the dynamic around you.

Your confidence will grow in the doing: it's forged when you speak even with shaky hands, when you extend an invitation for others to contribute, when you steady the table instead of waiting for someone else to do it. Those small choices compound into presence, credibility, and trust.

Every time you do, you reinforce a deeper truth: you don’t just belong here. You are actively shaping what “here” becomes for everyone at the table.

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE

At your next high-stakes meeting, pause and ask yourself: Am I showing up like a guest, or a host?

• If you’re sitting quietly, waiting for the right moment, experiment with contributing earlier: offer an insight, frame a key question, invite opinions, or connect threads others haven’t linked.

• If you usually focus only on your own points, try curating: draw someone else in, amplify a quieter voice, or summarize the room’s emerging consensus.

Notice how these shifts not only change your own sense of belonging but also elevate the experience of everyone at the table.

Because having the confidence to belong isn’t a gift; it’s a practice. And when you practice it well, you won’t just whisper “I belong here.” You’ll embody it and set an example that invites others to do the same.

Reach out for a free exploratory conversation at www.leslierohonczy.com.

TELLING WOMEN TO 'JUST SPEAK UP': The Problem with Performative Confidence

“You just need to speak up more.”

That’s the feedback my coaching client received from someone on the executive team. She’s a brilliant woman, promoted six months ago, building her team, and is delivering consistent results. Her response? “Speak up more? I’m going hoarse trying to be heard.” 

This is what lazy feedback sounds like. It lands with a thud and no instruction manual. It’s like being told to ‘just play better’ – without knowing which game you’re in, what the rules are, or who’s even keeping score. And yet, women still show up, adapt, and perform. That’s not a confidence gap – that’s a context gap. 

CONFIDENCE ISN’T A CHARACTER TRAIT 

Often, signs of wobbly confidence are treated like a personal failing, or like something women need to ‘fix.’ But that’s not how confidence works. Confidence is a response to context. It’s not that women lack confidence. It’s that they’ve learned there is a cost to displaying it. 

Research from Yale, McKinsey, and Catalyst confirms what many women already know in their bones because they’ve lived it: when we assert ourselves, advocate for our work, or step confidently into leadership space, we’re often judged more critically than our male peers. In cultures like these, success doesn’t automatically follow confidence; it follows calibration. Women learn to weigh every word, tone, and gesture to reduce the potential risk of backlash.

Women don’t dial themselves down out of fear; they do it because experience has taught them how the room tends to respond. We see it every time our ideas are restated by others and only then are taken seriously; when we’re interrupted mid-sentence in a way our male peers aren’t; or when we’re judged as abrasive for using the same tone that makes a man “decisive”. 

THE CREDIBILITY-COMPETENCE TIGHTROPE 

Here’s the impossible equation women are expected to solve: Be warm AND authoritative. Approachable AND assertive. Powerful but NOT pushy. Focus too much on competence, and you’re labelled cold. Lead with approachability, and you’re often underestimated. 

This dynamic, often called the “competence-likability trade-off,” shows up consistently in executive coaching conversations. Sheryl Sandberg described it in her acclaimed book ‘Lean In’ as one of the core tensions women face in leadership. While this pattern is especially well-documented for women, it also affects racialized leaders, neurodiverse professionals, and anyone whose communication style doesn’t match the dominant leadership norms that reward confidence only when it looks and sounds a certain way. 

It creates a constant pressure to perform, but only within a narrow set of rules. “Be confident, but not cocky. Speak up, but don’t overshadow. Be authentic, but only in ways that feel familiar and safe to others.” Telling women to "just project more confidence" doesn’t fix that tension. At best, this advice is unhelpful. At worst, it quietly holds women responsible for navigating a system that still penalises them for showing up fully. 

THE REAL COST OF PERFORMATIVE CONFIDENCE 

I’ve coached hundreds of women who had mastered the ‘act’: the composed tone, carefully measured eye contact, impeccable posture, firm handshake, and polished executive presence. They’d done everything ‘right’. And still, many felt invisible, disconnected from their own voice, and bone-tired from keeping up the performance. 

Performative confidence doesn’t empower – it depletes. 

Grounded confidence feels different. It’s anchored in purpose, emotional congruence, and what I call your ‘ness’: the distinctive wiring that makes you uniquely you. This isn’t about acting. It’s about aligning. We don’t need more women adapting to a narrow version of leadership. We need more workplaces that create the conditions for authentic confidence to thrive. 

SO WHAT ACTUALLY HELPS? 

Here’s what I’ve learned from almost two decades of coaching: 

1. Confidence grows in context, not in isolation. Instead of asking, “Why doesn’t she speak up?”, ask, “What makes this environment unsafe for her to contribute fully?”

2. Visibility is relational. Confidence doesn’t live inside one person. It grows in rooms where people are invited in, where their contributions are amplified, and where feedback fuels growth, not fear.

3. Self-awareness beats self-promotion. Encouraging women to double down on their authentic leadership identity – their ‘ness’ – is far more powerful than any tips on vocal tone or standing tall.

4. The real work is rewiring the system. Instead of ‘fixing’ women with one-size-fits-all advice, we need to take a closer look at the systems and cultures that still reward confidence in some forms – and penalise it in others. The question isn’t “How do we help women show up more confidently?” It’s “What needs to shift so their confidence can actually land?” 

READY FOR A CHANGE? 

If you're a woman in leadership, you don’t need to fake anything, or turn up the volume, or fit into someone else’s version of presence. You need the space to ground yourself in your wiring, your values, your way of leading. And if you're a leader or ally who wants to support that, the shift starts with curiosity, not critique.  

Try asking:

• What messages do we send about who gets to speak up, and how are those messages being communicated, implicitly or explicitly?

• How is confidence interpreted differently depending on who’s expressing it, and who’s listening?

• In what ways does our culture invite real presence, and when might we be unintentionally rewarding performative behaviours instead?

• What might shift or become possible if we broadened our definition of executive presence to include a wider range of authentic leadership styles?

Confidence isn’t something women are missing. It’s something that’s often misinterpreted, undervalued, or penalised, depending on who’s expressing it and how closely they match the ‘acceptable’ template. 

If you're a woman in leadership ready to trade performative behaviours for authentic presence, let's talk. Executive coaching can help you reconnect with your voice, your values, and a leadership style that doesn’t require you to shrink or shape-shift. 

And if you're a leader or ally working to foster a more inclusive leadership culture, coaching can help you examine how confidence is encouraged, interpreted, and rewarded in your organisation – and what may need to evolve.

THE CONFIDENCE MYTH: What I Learned (the Hard Way) About Building Real Confidence

Leslie Rohonczy, IMC™, PCC, Executive Coach, Leadership Expert, Speaker, Author

MAY 2025

There’s a weird myth about confidence out there, and I don't have a hot clue where it came from. It's the idea that you’re either born with confidence or you’re not. That some people are just lucky enough to “have it.” And the rest of us…? Well, sorry about our luck.

Like so many of us, I bought into that myth for a long time. And honestly? It just kept me small. Safe. Protected from... what? Judgment? From being seen as 'too much', 'too loud', taking up too much space?

If you’re thinking, "Yeah, me too," you're in good company! So many of us are not born confident. I certainly wasn't! I had to build it, brick by wobbly brick. Through late-night doubts, shaky first steps, awkward experiments, and moments when my inner critic fired up the flamethrower and scorched my ass.

I learned along the way that confidence isn’t something you’re handed. It’s something you create.

Here’s how.

Confidence Isn’t Magic – It’s Motion (and a New Deal with Failure)

If I had waited until I “felt ready,” I’d still be sitting on the sidelines, perfectly preparing. But confidence doesn’t come from waiting. It comes from moving – from taking imperfect, courageous action before you feel fully prepared.

I really wish someone had told me this little nugget sooner: make friends with failure. Not the dramatic, life-or-death, fatal flaw kind of failure. I mean the everyday, small, awkward misses; the times when things don’t land quite the way you hoped.

Early on, I thought every stumble I made seemed to confirm a limiting belief I had that I wasn’t good enough. Now I see it differently: if I’m learning, it's not failure – it's just data. Feedback. An indicator of growth. It’s your brain using that new data to learn, course-correct, and get sharper for next time.

One of the biggest confidence boosts you can give yourself after a stumble is learning to say, "I’m not there... yet." The real magic is in the willingness to reframe, reflect, tweak, and try again.

Confidence doesn’t mean you’ll never fall. It means you trust yourself to get up, dust off, and take a next step, smarter for having tried.

Confidence Comes from Owning Your 'Ness', Not Borrowing Someone Else's

In my early leadership days, I thought if I could just act like some of the impressive leaders around me, I’d finally feel confident. Spoiler alert: copying others just didn't work. Sure, there's some truth to the old 'fake it til you make it' chestnut, but every time I tried to wear someone else’s leadership “suit,” it felt stiff and exhausting, like I was showing up to a marathon in a full hazmat suit.

Real confidence didn’t click for me until I started leading with my own ‘Leslie-ness’ – the gifts and abilities that made me unique: my creativity, ability to connect dots, love of emotional intelligence, voracious curiosity, and powerful questions.

Confidence isn’t about volume, bravado, or mimicking. It’s about alignment and letting your best, truest self lead the way. You have your own 'ness,' too, and trust me, it’s your biggest asset!

Your Inner Critic Isn’t Going Away – But You Can Change the Relationship

Even today, after all the hard work and awareness-building, my inner critic still pipes up sometimes (I call her 'Mimi', after the Drew Carey Show character Mimi Bobek haha!) She says things like: "Are you sure you’re ready for this?" "Maybe you should wait until you’re better prepared." "Don't be so bold! Everyone will think you're a showoff!"

I used to think confidence meant silencing that voice. In fact, I've wanted to throw Mimi into the trunk of my car and push it off a cliff many times! But that never works, because our Inner Critics have an important job: they try to keep us safe by making us aware of something they think we’re not aware of. (They just have a weird way of going about it!)

Today I realize that I don't need to kill 'Mimi', I just need to keep her out of the driver’s seat. When I notice that she is starting to fire up, I picture her riding in the backseat of my car; hands off the wheel and no access to the radio, thank you very much! And I’m the only one allowed to choose the route. (Thanks to Liz Gilbert for this wonderful idea!)

You don’t have to eradicate self-doubt to be confident. You just have to stop letting it make your decisions.

Failure Isn’t Fatal – It’s Fuel

We’ve all heard the term ‘failing fast,’ usually tossed around by well-meaning leaders who want to encourage quicker thinking and braver experiments. It's meant to free us from worrying about getting everything perfect, to help us be more confident, and to nudge us into trying bolder, out-of-the-box ideas. And while those intentions are good, true failure is still emotionally messy, discouraging, and painful.

I understand it differently now: Failure isn’t a dead end. It’s just an unintended result. When something doesn’t go the way I'd hoped, I’ve learned to step back and ask: What part worked? What part didn’t? What did I learn that I can apply next time?

Over the years, I've been steadily building this reflection muscle, and while it hasn't always been easy, it has helped me turn misses into insights and wobbly results into stepping stones. Confidence grows when you realize you’re not fragile, flawed, or failing; you’re learning, adapting, and getting stronger.

Confidence Is a Practice, Not a Personality Trait

If you’re waiting to magically feel confident all the time, let me save you the suspense: you’ll be waiting forever. Confidence isn’t a trophy you win once and display forever. It’s a living, breathing practice.

Some days it flows through you easily. Other days, you’ll have to dust it off and rebuild it, piece by piece. And that’s normal. But every time you step up, even when you’re unsure, you’re proving something important to yourself: that you can handle the unknown; that you can learn as you go; and that you are braver and stronger than your fear.

If confidence has ever felt like something other people had and you didn’t, hear this message loud and clear: it’s not something you’re born with; it’s something you build, one imperfect action at a time; one courageous experiment at a time; one “not yet” moment at a time.

So go ahead, take up your space. Say the thing. Try the new way. Wobble your way forward. The future you (the one who already knows you are enough and that you belong), is cheering you on.

And so am I.

THE ART OF TOUGH CONVERSATIONS: Best Practices for Leaders

by Leslie Rohonczy, Executive Coach, IMC, PCC | ©2024 | www.leslierohonczy.com

In the realm of leadership, tough conversations are inevitable. And no matter how high your level of seniority is, the challenging emotions we might experience during these interactions can be uncomfortable. Whether delivering critical feedback, discussing performance issues, or, perhaps most challenging of all, letting someone go, these conversations are an integral part of your leadership accountability.

 As an executive coach, I've helped many leaders navigate the emotional and professional complexities in preparing for challenging conversations. Here are some of the challenges I’ve seen senior leaders wrestle with, and some of the best practices to consider when preparing for tough conversations.

THE CHALLENGES

Emotional Toll | The emotional burden of tough conversations can be significant. Leaders often feel a sense of personal responsibility and empathy towards their employees, making the act of delivering bad news particularly stressful. This emotional toll on the leader can lead to procrastination, avoidance, and increased anxiety. For example, you may hesitate to let an underperforming team member go because you know the individual is going through personal hardships, such as a family illness. Your empathy can make it difficult to separate your personal feelings from your professional responsibilities.

 Maintaining Professionalism | Balancing empathy with professionalism is crucial. Leaders must convey the necessary messages without letting their emotions cloud their judgment or delivery. Striking this balance is often easier said than done, especially when the conversation has significant consequences for the employee. For example, during a performance review, you may feel tempted to downplay negative feedback to avoid hurting the employee’s feelings. However, this could lead to misunderstandings about the seriousness of the issues and hinder the employee's growth.

 Legal and Ethical Considerations | Navigating the legal and ethical implications of difficult conversations, particularly terminations, adds another layer of complexity to an already-challenging discussion. Ensuring the conversation is conducted fairly, respectfully, and in compliance with legal standards is essential to avoid potential repercussions. For example, when terminating an employee, ensure that the specific reasons for termination are well-documented and legally sound to prevent claims of wrongful dismissal or discrimination. This requires careful preparation and adherence to HR policies and legal guidelines.

BEST PRACTICES & ‘TRY-ITS’

Preparation is Key | Thorough preparation is vital for any tough conversation. Leaders should clearly outline the key points they need to convey and reflect on likely potential reactions from the employee. Practicing the conversation beforehand can help in articulating thoughts more clearly and confidently. Try-it: Before a meeting to discuss a significant performance issue, prepare by reviewing the employee’s performance records, noting specific incidents that illustrate the problem, and rehearse how to present this information in a clear, constructive, and respectful way.

 Be Direct but Compassionate | Honesty is crucial, but it must be balanced with compassion. Be direct about the issues at hand, but also express empathy and understanding. This approach helps to respect and maintain the person’s dignity while clearly communicating the necessary message. Clear is kind. Try-it: When informing an employee about their termination, you could say, “This decision was incredibly difficult, and I understand it’s a lot to take in. We’ve seen a consistent pattern in performance that hasn’t improved despite our efforts, and we need to make this change. I’m here to support you through this transition.”

Create a Safe Environment | Conduct the conversation in a private, comfortable setting where the employee feels safe. This environment encourages open communication and helps manage the emotional intensity of the situation. Ensure there are no interruptions and that the focus remains on the conversation topic. Try-it: Schedule the conversation in a private office or a neutral, quiet space where you won’t be interrupted. This setting helps the employee feel respected and ensures the conversation remains confidential.

 Listen Actively | Active listening is a critical skill during tough conversations. Allow the employee to express their thoughts and feelings without interruption. Acknowledge their emotions and show that you value their perspective. This approach fosters a sense of respect and understanding, even in difficult circumstances. Try-it: If an employee reacts emotionally to feedback, you might respond, “I hear that you’re feeling frustrated and upset. Your work is important to us, and I want to understand your perspective. Let’s talk more about what’s been challenging for you.”

 Provide Support and Resources | When letting someone go, offer support and resources to help them through this transition. Support could include outplacement services, references, or guidance on the next steps. Demonstrating your commitment to their well-being, especially through their departure, conveys that you care about them, and that the company is committed to supporting them. Try-it: After informing an employee of their termination, you could offer, “We’ve arranged for outplacement services to help you find your next opportunity. They’ll be really helpful in helping you navigate the next steps to finding the role that’s right for you.”

 Follow Up | After the conversation, follow up with the employee to ensure they are coping well. This could be a brief check-in or offering additional support if needed. For remaining team members, communicate about the change to the team as transparently as possible – while respecting the departing employee’s confidentiality – and address any concerns they might have. This will help you to monitor morale and trust within the team, as forced departures tend to create fear and anxiety in remaining employees. Try-it: A few days after a tough conversation with your employee, reach out to them with an email or call, saying, “I wanted to check in and see how you’re doing. If you need any additional support, please let me know.” And when an employee has been terminated, you can say to the remaining employees, “I want to address the recent changes and reassure you that we are here to support each of you through this transition. I won’t communicate the specific reasons for the departure, because I’m respecting their privacy, but I invite your questions and concerns.”

As a leader, tough conversations are part of your role. Embrace challenging conversations as opportunities to foster growth and resilience within your team and organization and as a leadership development opportunity. These experiences will not only help you strengthen your leadership, but they can help you cultivate a culture of candor and accountability in your organization.

WHAT LIMITING BELIEFS ARE HOLDING YOU BACK?

by Leslie Rohonczy, Executive Coach, IMC, PCC | ©2024 | www.leslierohonczy.com

In a recent coaching session, I worked with a client who had made an important career decision. Together, we explored how certain unconscious, limiting beliefs can silently influence our experiences, behaviors, and perceptions. These beliefs often lurk beneath the surface, shaping our lives without us even realizing it.

What I’ve noticed is that it doesn’t matter whether my client comes from the business or music world; emerging or seasoned professional; CXO or entry-level employee; limiting beliefs can keep us small, stuck, and blocked from living our best lives.

Research by Dr. Carol Dweck, the renowned psychologist who coined the terms "fixed mindset" and "growth mindset", highlights the pervasive nature of limiting beliefs. She describes how beliefs about our abilities can profoundly impact our success. Those with a fixed mindset have the limiting belief that their abilities (or lack of abilities) are innate and unchangeable, leading them to shy away from challenges. Conversely, those with a growth mindset view challenges as opportunities for growth and embrace them wholeheartedly.

Take, for instance, a common limiting belief I’ve seen with clients: expecting other people to react with the same emotions WE would have in a similar situation. The reality is that we’re all wired differently, and we can’t rely on our own emotional wiring and internal perceptions to map how others will react.

Another limiting belief that many of us unconsciously hold is believing that we can somehow control others' thoughts or opinions about us. As I've written in my book, ‘Coaching Life: Navigating Life’s Most Common Coaching Topics’, what others think of you is simply none of your business. Others’ reactions to you – negative or positive – just shows you how others are wired, and what THEY pay attention to. It doesn’t reveal any more to you about who YOU are, your worth, or your value.

If, like many others, this topic of limiting beliefs resonates for you too, here's a powerful four-step coaching practice to tackle limiting beliefs head-on.

Challenge Assumptions with Evidence

1.      Identify the Limiting Belief: Start by pinpointing the belief that is underlying a behavior you wish to change. What limiting belief prevents you from acting they way you want to, or causes you to second-guess yourself? Reflect on past experiences and patterns to uncover the root cause of your limiting belief.

2.      Seek Supporting Evidence: Ask yourself: what evidence can I find that reinforces this belief? Considering both internal experiences and external influences, what evidence or proof confirms this belief to be true? And how do you know they’re true?

3.      What Evidence Proves the Opposite is True: Seek out evidence to challenge or disprove your limiting belief. Challenge yourself to adopt a curious and open-minded approach, striving for as many other perspectives as you can find. The simple act of looking for opposite examples to our limiting beliefs creates relief from the anxiety of harsh self-judgment. (When we go looking for this contrary evidence, we have a pretty good chance of finding it.)

4.      How Would You Behave Differently: Finally, envision how you would behave if this limiting belief were not holding you back, and the opposite were in fact true. Visualize yourself taking bold and confident actions aligned with your true desires and values. Experiment with showing up in this new way, and notice what is more accessible to you as a result – inside of you in the moment; in the room with others; how people respond differently to you; and how you feel differently about yourself, as a result.

Remember, while beliefs shape our reality, they are not immutable truths. By ferreting out our limiting beliefs, one at a time, and then challenging and reshaping them with a growth mindset, we transform our experiences, and have more resources available to realize our true potential.

WHAT’S YOUR IMPOSTER RESPONSE?

by Leslie Rohonczy, Executive Coach, IMC, PCC | ©2024 | www.leslierohonczy.com

Are you wrestling with imposter ‘syndrome’? Many of us grapple with self-inflicted shame, feeling like frauds and fearing that someone will eventually stumble upon our terrible secret: “I don’t know what I’m doing; I don’t deserve to be here; and it’s just a matter of time before I get found out!”  We explain away our accomplishments as the result of serendipitous luck, or clever trickery, and believe that eventually we will be exposed when someone realizes that we don’t have a hot clue what we’re doing. It often hits people that outwardly look like they have it all going on: high achieving, academically accomplished bright lights who secretly doubt their own abilities despite obvious evidence to the contrary, and who instead believe they are inadequate, incompetent, flawed, failures. Roughly 85% of working adults admit to feeling inadequate or incompetent at work, and almost 70% don't feel they deserve their current success. Of these, one in four said they experience these feelings often, or all the time.

 When clients arrive with a self-diagnosis of imposter ‘syndrome’, I prefer to reframe it as an imposter ‘response’ to what they’re experiencing (it should never have been pathologized as a clinical diagnosis in the first place). Imposter response can manifest differently depending on a person’s background, personality, life experience and circumstances, but the common denominator is the fear of being ‘found out’. The imposter response is related to our inner critics: while our inner critic is focused on self-judgment, our imposter response is preoccupied with what to do about it to avoid shame. And in working with hundreds of individuals over the years, I’m convinced that culturally, we are experiencing epidemic proportions of imposter response at this time in our modern world.

 Here are five imposter response types, based loosely on the work of Dr. Valerie Young. Notice the sense of striving that is the common thread in each of them and how they all ultimately create shame (although what they strive for is different).

THE SILVER MEDALIST

I’ve called this the silver medalist, rather than gold, because winning a silver medal feels like profound inadequacy. The silver medalist has lost their event to the gold medalist – it feels worse than the bronze medalist, who had to win their competition to reach the podium. The feeling of failure attached to this imposter response is palpable. Silver Medalists strive for perfection and focus on ‘how’ they’re getting things done. They will set excessively ambitious goals for themselves, and then experience unbearable self-doubt and anxiety; often they will compensate by over-controlling, becoming impatient, and feeling that no one else is capable. Work must be done perfectly every time, and they take no joy in their success, feeling like they could always have done a better job. These are the micromanagers who won’t delegate, and if they do, they will be unsatisfied with the result from others. One tiny mistake in an otherwise excellent performance feels like failure, which triggers shame.

THE SUPERHERO

If we are convinced that we’re a phony going undetected among authentic colleagues, we protect our dirty little secret by striving to work harder than everyone else around us. This ‘superhero’ type usually has consequences on physical and mental health and can impact relationships. Superheroes are typically workaholics who rarely find time for self-care, hobbies, or relaxation. They don’t feel worthy of their titles so must prove their worth through acts of continuous striving, rather than from the output of the work itself. Their focus is on measuring their worth by how many things they can juggle and do well. When they miss the unrealistically high mark, they feel shame for not being capable of perfectly handling everything.

THE VIRTUOSO

The belief that they need to be a natural born genius causes this type to harshly judge how quickly and easily they perform, without considering how much effort or expertise is truly needed to excel in an area. If Virtuosos take ‘too long’ to pick up a new skill, they feel ashamed. They combine unreasonable expectations with harsh self-judgement about the need to perform perfectly right away. The Virtuoso is an action-oriented perfectionist that focuses on how quickly and easily something gets accomplished. If they struggle to ramp up or learn a new skill and can’t create a masterpiece right away, they equate that to failure, which triggers shame.

THE SOLOIST

Some people want to be perceived as independent and hold the belief that asking others for help exposes them as frauds. Soloists carry a very heavy load because they believe that they must prove their worth, that it’s all up to them, that no one else is going to come and rescue them, so they must do for themselves. They often refuse help, and if they end up requiring assistance from someone else, they feel diminished as a result. To feel accomplished, the Soloist must do it alone; to need help is to be a failure, which evokes shame.

THE GURU

Gurus measure their competence by what they know, and how well they can do something. They believe they can never know enough information, and are afraid of being perceived as inexperienced, ill-informed, unaware, or downright wrong. Their constant thirst for more training, certification or knowledge prevents them from really experiencing the weight of their expertise fully. Their focus is on what they can do, and how much they know. When Gurus can’t meet the unattainable expectation to know absolutely everything, they feel like failures, which triggers shame.

HOW TO QUIET YOUR IMPOSTER RESPONSE

If you’ve experienced imposter response, you probably chalked your success up to external influences, chance, charisma, connections, dumb luck, or your finely-honed ability to skate your way through life. But the imposter’s true dragon slayer lies within us, not outside of ourselves. Here are a few ideas you can experiment with.

• Accept that you in fact are an imposter at various times in your life – and that’s normal. We all are, in some way. But if we let our imposter drive this bus, it will rob us of the chance to really feel our accomplishment.

• At the root of the imposter response is an inability to internalize success (‘thanks, but I just got lucky’; ‘thanks, but it’s not perfect’; ‘thanks, but I got it at a thrift shop’). It’s often lauded as humility (however false it may be). Owning our victories takes authenticity and personal integrity.

• Some people feel the need to seek validation from others, even clinging to backhanded compliments or slightly positive feedback. Allow yourself to feel great when someone pays you a compliment, but don’t rely on external validation as the measure of your self-worth.

• Sometimes we can fall into the trap of setting the bar low, or even failing intentionally. Experiment with embracing the challenge – all in. If you succeed, you will have internalized it as a personal win. And if you don’t, it’s an opportunity to acknowledge your bravery in daring to try.

• Some who struggle with their impostors become paralyzed in thought about what they want to do, waiting until they feel more ‘ready’. What might you have to loosen your grip on, to allow yourself to experiment?

The more we can get into motion and take specific actions that move us towards our goals, the less of a hold our imposter will have on us. In fact, authenticity is the Imposter’s kryptonite. When we decide that we will live our authentic truth every day, we align our thoughts and behaviors with our values, creating a sense of true freedom to be exactly who we are meant to be.

If you’re curious to explore how your imposter response may be getting in your way, contact me for a free coaching consultation. I’d love to help you tame your imposter response and build greater confidence, self-awareness, and strategies for success.

 LESLIE ROHONCZY | Executive Coach (PCC), Integral Master Coach™ (IMC)

613-863-8347 | LESLIEROHONCZY@LIVE.COM | WWW.LESLIEROHONCZY.COM