THE DELEGATION UPGRADE: What Most Over-Functioning Leaders Get Wrong (and a Free Tool!)

By Leslie Rohonczy, IMC™, PCC, Executive Coach, Leadership Expert, Speaker, Author

APRIL 2025

You don’t need to delegate more. You need to delegate better. Here's a story that'll explain what I mean.

I was working with a senior VP coaching client and during a discussion about her capacity, we shifted our conversation to the topic of delegation. I told her I had noticed that she was quite proud of her ability to empower her team. “I’m great at delegation,” she told me. “I trust my people. I don’t micromanage.”

Having observed her in action over several weeks during her 1:1s and team meetings, I saw something different: her calendar was jammed with back-to-back meetings; she sent out directive emails at all hours; she regularly worked weekends to fix her team's mistakes, and to catch up on her own work. I also noticed the reaction of her employees, and the impact on her team. Her employees didn’t seem to be confident or engaged and were unwilling to take initiative.

That instinct to ‘do it all’ is called over-functioning – doing the thinking, making the decisions, doing the ‘doing’, then re-doing what was done to meet an unreasonably high standard – all the while believing you’ve 'handed it off'.

My client is not alone. Delegation, and over-functioning in particular, is a common leadership coaching topic. And it doesn’t always look like martyrdom or micromanagement – most of the time, it’s a well-intentioned leader jumping in to help, filling in the blanks, or fixing things behind the scenes. And sometimes, it happens because a leader simply loves the 'doing'. But that pattern comes at a cost – to the leader’s capacity, to the team’s development, and to the overall trust within the team.

If you’re doing all the thinking and troubleshooting, you’re unintentionally teaching your team not to.

Leaders often fall into one of two over-functioning patterns:

  • The Martyr: “It’s just easier if I do it myself.”

  • The Micromanager: “I know I handed it over, but the output isn’t perfect, so I’ll fix it.”

Both are understandable. Neither actually works long term. So let’s shift the conversation to explore what's driving that behaviour, below the surface.

DELEGATION ISN’T ABOUT 'LETTING GO' OR 'SETTLING'

Here’s a myth that most leaders have been taught: Delegation means taking something off your to-do list and handing it to someone else.

But delegation is much more than that. Real, purposeful delegation is an act of generosity and trust. It’s not just about removing a task from your plate – it’s about staying involved in the right ways.

Let’s look at three common – and very different – delegation missteps that illustrate the cost of getting it wrong.

The scenario: You ask an employee to lead a project review and create a status update to present to the executive team.

Misstep #1: Hand-Off and Hope: You forward the meeting invite and say, “You’re up. Good luck.” They scramble to prepare, unsure of what matters most to the audience or what success looks like. Their output misses the mark, and you end up rewriting the entire presentation the night before. The result? Frustration on both sides and an employee who feels overwhelmed rather than empowered. What’s missing: the leadership scaffolding of clarity, support, and trust.

Misstep #2: Polisher’s Pitfall: Your employee completes their review, creates the report, and sends it back to you. It’s thoughtful, accurate, and 95 percent there, but not quite how you would have done it. Instead of offering constructive feedback or coaching them to close the gap, you quietly rewrite the whole thing to get it “just right.” It may feel efficient in the moment, but the cost is invisible and cumulative: confidence erodes, trust thins, and motivation takes a hit. Over time, your people stop stretching and start playing small.

Misstep #3: Ego Editor: If you’ve ever thought, “I just want to make a few improvements, to put my mark on it”, your edits aren't about quality control – they're about identity and ego. Many leaders unintentionally use editing as a way to demonstrate their value, showcase expertise, or subtly reassert ownership. But the trade-off is that every time you rewrite instead of coach, you send the message that your team’s work isn’t good enough, or that your version is the only one that counts. What starts as helpful becomes harmful. Over time, initiative fades, people disengage, and the team learns that ‘done’ doesn’t mean ‘trusted.’

Now picture a different version of this same scenario: You spend ten minutes upfront with your employee, walking through the context, clarifying expectations, and defining success. When they deliver the work, you don’t rewrite it or put your personal stamp on it – instead, you offer thoughtful questions and clear, actionable feedback that helps them refine, adjust, and learn. You’re not hovering, rescuing, or reasserting your mark – you’re scaffolding. You’re guiding.

When you delegate well, powerful things happen:

  • You build trust.

  • Your employee gains confidence and capability.

  • Your leadership style evolves as you shift from doing to developing, from directing to empowering.

  • Delegation becomes less about task completion and more about capability-building and culture-shaping.

This kind of leadership isn’t about perfection. It’s about being okay with 90%, if it means your people are getting stronger, faster, and more confident. It’s about holding the line between quality and growth – and having the courage to let your team take real ownership, even if it’s not perfect. Because that’s what builds future-ready teams. That’s what scales leadership.

To be fair, most senior leaders were never formally taught how to delegate. They built their careers on being high performers – solving problems, delivering results, and executing with speed and precision. These strengths earned them promotions, but once they step into leadership, the very habits that made them successful can begin to backfire.

As a leader, your job is no longer to do the work yourself – it’s to get the work done through others. That means shifting from being the expert who executes to the leader who inspires and enables execution. It’s about creating the conditions where your team can stretch, learn, and deliver, effectively and consistently.

When leaders continue doing it all themselves, they don’t just slow things down – they inadvertently block growth, erode trust, and limit team potential. To lead well, delegation isn’t a luxury – it’s a leadership necessity.

THE EMPOWERED DELEGATION MAP: FIVE QUESTIONS THAT CAN CHANGE EVERYTHING

This simple tool can help you plan your delegation moments more thoughtfully. Whether you're assigning a project, handing over a recurring task, or reflecting on something that didn’t quite land – the Empowered Delegation Map invites you to get intentional.

Here are the four reflection questions:

1. What’s the desired outcome? Be specific. What needs to happen? By when? And why does it matter?

2. What context or guardrails make this safe to delegate? What do they need to know? What decisions are theirs to make? What boundaries matter?

3. What would learning look like – even if it’s imperfect? What’s the stretch zone? What are you willing to tolerate in service of their development?

4. What’s the cost if I keep doing this myself? What’s the impact on your energy, focus, or leadership credibility? And what growth opportunity are they missing?

5. What will I do differently, as a result of this reflection? What new move do you want to experiment with? When will you try this? With whom? What criteria will you use to determine your level of success at this new move?

Try walking through the Empowered Delegation Map in advance of a handoff conversation, or even in retrospect. You might be surprised by what gets revealed through this simple but powerful coaching practice.

BE THE LIGHTHOUSE, NOT THE LIFEGUARD

Effective leaders are like lighthouses. They don’t climb into the boat and start bailing water – they shine a focused beam of light for others to find the hole. They broaden their beam and give enough direction to help the team find their way through a challenging strait. They are steady, anchored, and visible, and they trust their people to navigate with increasing confidence.

The challenging part is that most of us were trained to jump in and prove our value by solving and doing. But empowered delegation means resisting that impulse. It means letting others fumble a bit, so they can build awareness, skill, and capability, and learn important lessons that help them develop. It means learning when to shine a focused beam on something specific – and when to widen the light to illuminate the broader path.

When leaders delegate with clarity and purpose, something powerful happens. Their team stops waiting for direction and starts thinking for themselves. They feel trusted, and they step up in response. Ownership grows. Capacity expands. Leaders begin to spend more time where they create the most value – on strategic priorities – and less time putting out fires.

And there’s a bonus ripple effect: when your direct reports experience empowered delegation, they start to model it too, and before you know it, you’ve helped shift the culture toward greater ownership and trust.

TRY THE DELEGATION MAP – AND SEE WHAT SHIFTS

If you’re ready to delegate in a way that supports your people, strengthens your leadership, and frees up your capacity, download the free Empowered Delegation Map and give it a try. Use it before your next 1:1, during team planning, or even to debrief a delegation moment that didn’t land quite the way you hoped.

You might be surprised by how much shifts – not just in your team, but in your own mindset and habits as a leader.

LEADERSHIP STRENGTH AT FULL VOLUME: The Strength vs Overstrength Paradox

Leslie Rohonczy, IMC™, PCC, Executive Coach, Leadership Expert, Speaker, Author

A senior leader walks into a team meeting (doesn’t that sound like the opening line to a joke!?), excited about his newly minted strategic vision, and confidently shares several decisions that he’s made. He offers a long list of ideas for reaction and execution, and he poses some powerful questions he wants answered. Each of these things is a quality leadership behaviour. So why does the room fall silent?

Chances are they’re not in awe; they’re overwhelmed.

This is a common occurrence in leadership, but it isn’t a villain story; it’s a visibility story – one that happens every day in organizations where well-intended leaders lean a little too far into their strengths. And the very qualities that earned them trust, promotions, and praise start to have the opposite effect.

This is the strength/over-strength paradox, and at its heart, it is a deceptively simple idea: a leadership strength, when overplayed, becomes a liability.

And yet, many leaders aren’t aware it’s happening until the damage is done. Why? Because they’re doing what’s always worked. Until it doesn’t.

WHY THIS MATTERS MORE THAN EVER

Trust in leadership is one of the strongest drivers of employee engagement and performance. And yet, in multiple global studies, more than half of employees say they don’t feel seen, heard, or understood by their leaders. That’s not just a gap – that’s a chasm! And in that chasm lurks the over-strength trap.

Think of your leadership as a soundboard in a recording studio. Every leadership attribute is an individual channel on the board:

  • strategic vision

  • decision-making

  • humility

  • communication

  • empathy

  • integrity

  • accountability

  • delegation

  • motivation

  • innovation

  • negotiation

  • change management

  • critical thinking

  • other (your unique leadership attributes)

When tuned just right, they create a harmonious mix. But push the fader too high on any one strength, and suddenly what was once inspiring becomes jarring. What was pleasing is now uncomfortable. What had been clear is now out of phase. And even though the other channels are set at the right volume, it can ruin the whole mix.

Let’s break it down using the graphic below, a snapshot of nine core leadership strengths (there are many others, some unique only to you!) Here’s what can happen when their volumes go unchecked.

STORIES FROM THE FRONT

Here’s where theory meets reality. These five short case studies are based on real coaching themes that have played out in boardrooms, team meetings, and one-on-ones. They showcase the human side of leadership; the moment where a well-meaning strength quietly shifts into overdrive, and the team dynamic shifts in response. If any of these stories feel familiar, you’re not alone – and you’re not off track. You’re just being invited to listen differently to your leadership ‘mix’, so you can make some adjustments, and tune your soundboard accordingly.

Case #1: The Strategic Visionary

Rajesh was known for his powerful strategic thinking. His colleagues described him as “the guy who could see around corners”. His head was typically five years ahead of the others on his team, who were still focused on Q1. His team was inspired... at first. But soon, they started feeling disconnected from the day-to-day realities. When asked what they needed to succeed, one team member quietly said, "I just need to know what I should be doing tomorrow." Rajesh had slipped into overstrength. His people felt abandoned in the present, trying to navigate the complexities on their own.

Case #2: The Empathetic Avoider

Marissa had developed a high level of emotional intelligence and compassion throughout her leadership career. Her people loved her warm personality; she was a great listener and genuinely seemed to care about them. She remembered birthdays, gave ‘free’ days off when they felt overwhelmed, and offered a soft shoulder to cry on when there was trouble at home. She also actively looked for developmental opportunities to offer each of her employees that would help them grow their careers. But when it came time to have hard conversations like missed deadlines, employee conflicts, or poor performance, she froze. Her empathy channel was so loud that it had drowned out her leadership accountability channel. She became avoidant, and slowly her team’s accountability eroded to the point that Marissa’s group developed a reputation for poor performance, which caused her top performers to look elsewhere, and made recruiting new employees difficult.

Case #3: The Humble Underdog

David was seen as a humble guy. He was always quick to credit his team for any successes and rarely took the spotlight. But over time, his unwillingness to take centre stage meant that he was invisible most of the time, which became a liability. Without the willingness to take up his full leadership space, the executive team couldn’t see his impact. David’s team, once proud of his modesty, started wondering if he lacked confidence in them – or in himself. It was an unnecessary distraction from the team’s mission and targets. Some became disengaged, while others tried to compensate by becoming more vocal (with uneven results). David’s humility had become an overstrength that muted his ability for bold influence, and his career stalled.

Case #4: The Delegating Ghost

Carla was an expert delegator. She understood delegation of authority thresholds and empowered her delegates to make decisions on her behalf and take action accordingly. She trusted her team and rarely micromanaged. But Carla wasn’t big on oversight. In fact, you could say she was allergic to it. Bored with mundane operational details, Carla preferred to live in the future, playing with strategic modelling and innovation trends. But without regular check-ins, guidance, and oversight, not only were projects veering off course and timelines slipping, but her people began to resent her, too. To her employees, Carla hadn’t delegated; she’d disappeared.

Case #5: The Motivational Machine

Jorge brought infectious energy to his leadership conversations. He was all about goal setting, giving recognition, and getting people fired up. His favourite expression was “push through”, something he often told employees when they raised concerns about their workload or capacity challenges. He was proud of how much his team could deliver, but as burnout crept in, his relentless positivity became exhausting. The team felt pressured to always perform at 110%, and some began hiding their struggles for fear of letting him down.

What once inspired them became a stress multiplier, and Jorge ended up with three employees on short-term stress leave.

All five of these leaders were doing what they thought was right. And they weren’t wrong. They just didn’t notice when their strengths started working against them.

BEST PRACTICES FOR BALANCING ACTS

So, how do you keep your soundboard balanced when the volume has crept up too high on one channel? How do you raise the volume on other channels to compensate? The following tips are some quick but powerful ways to ensure your leadership is landing the way you intend. These practices are grounded in real coaching tools and everyday leadership behaviours that can help you calibrate your leadership mix.

Make Feedback Normal, Not Formal

Build feedback into everyday conversation. The best leaders are curious, not just about ideas, outputs, metrics, and strategy, but about their own leadership impact. Ask: "What’s something I’m doing that’s getting in the way right now?"

Name Your Over-Strength

Introduce the strength/overstrength paradox concept to your team. Invite them to help you calibrate. It creates safety, builds trust, and diffuses the fear that giving feedback means they’re criticizing your character. Ask yourself: "Where might my team be seeing more of this strength than they need right now? What’s the unintended consequence I haven’t noticed yet?"

Coach the Strength Back to Centre

When a strength starts showing up too often or too intensely, it’s not about switching it off. It’s about adjusting the channel volume. Get back to the core purpose of the behaviour and check in on how it's being received. Ask yourself: "What’s the original intention here? What’s the ripple effect? What would ‘just enough’ look like?"

Use the 3-Point Leadership Lens

This quick tool helps leaders get out of autopilot and into alignment. Every time you lean on a strength, check:

  • is it aligned with the mission?

  • is it right for this moment?

  • is it working for the people?

What worked in the past may not land now, especially in times of change. Ask yourself: "Is this strength in service of the bigger picture – or is it just my default setting?"

Revisit Regularly

Strengths evolve. So should your leadership. Schedule quarterly self-check-ins, and invite an executive coach to help you explore your blind spots. Ask yourself: "What strengths have I been leaning on heavily this quarter? When I pause to consider whether they’re still fit for purpose, what do I notice?"

THE INVITATION

Leadership isn’t about turning every channel up to eleven. It’s about learning to engineer your soundboard. A little more clarity here, a little less volume there. Bringing in the bass line of strategy without drowning out the higher notes of empathy. The best leaders aren’t the loudest or smartest in the room. They’re the most attuned.

When your strength becomes someone else’s struggle – it’s time to rebalance. So here’s an opportunity to experiment: Be in relationship with your leadership strengths. Take the time to listen to each channel in relation to the other channels, and in relation to the overall mix. Notice what needs adjustment, what’s sitting just right in the mix, and what might need a gentle nudge back to centre.