THE MIDLIFE PIVOT: Redefining Ambition in the Second Act

(LISTEN TO THE NARRATED AUDIOARTICLE VERSION)

I worked at the local newspaper in my 20s and 30s, and was hungry to make progress in my career. I wanted the office, the title, and the nameplate on the door that would surely tell me I had ‘arrived.’ When I finally got a hard-fought promotion and found myself in that crappy little clapboard office in the middle of the advertising department, I had sphincter-shifting moment of clarity: Was this what I had been working so long and hard for? This office with no window and no purpose? How could all of my striving, motivation, blood, sweat, and tears really have been about this?!

Years later, in my executive coaching work with leaders, I’ve heard similar stories from clients describing their moments of clarity: when the goals that once excited them no longer light them up. The visible symbols of success are still there of course, but for them, something feels off. The motivation that once fueled them now struggles to spark.

They’re not in crisis. They’re not even unhappy. They’re just… restless. In the spaces between deadlines and deliverables, a question begins to echo: Is this it?

If that sounds familiar, you’re not alone. More and more leaders are confronting what I call the midlife awareness pivot; the moment we realize that our ambition has changed its shape.

THE MYTH OF LINEAR SUCCESS

For most of our careers, we’re taught to think of success as a straight line: more responsibility, bigger budgets, progressive titles and offices on higher floors. It’s a climb, and each rung on the ladder is supposed to bring more satisfaction.

Except that often, it doesn’t.

I've worked with executive coaching clients at the mid-points of their careers, who had achieved what they set out to do, but who were feeling oddly disengaged. This often surprised or embarrassed them. Their resumes were impressive, but the goals that used to light them up didn't inspire them anymore. Their energy felt depleted, and they maintained some momentum because stopping felt dangerous.

If you can relate, know this: it isn’t a failure or a flaw; it’s evolution. You’ve simply outgrown your previous version of 'ambition'.

Economists David Blanchflower and Andrew Oswald (2008, Social Science & Medicine) documented what’s now called the U-shaped curve of happiness: career and life satisfaction tend to dip in midlife, not because we’ve done something wrong, but because our definition of fulfilment is catching up with who we’ve become. Harvard’s long-running Grant Study echoes this, showing that satisfaction tends to rebound later in life when people align work and purpose.

In other words: the problem isn’t the ladder. It’s that we’ve been climbing it without asking whether it’s still leaning against the right wall.

THE REAL ISSUE ISN’T BURNOUT, IT’S MEANING DEBT

Burnout is about exhaustion. But the emptiness we experience due to the erosion of purpose is what I call 'meaning debt': chasing goals without reflecting on what really matters to us.

Many leaders in their forties and fifties tell me they’re “fine.” Their teams perform, their calendars are full, and they keep checking the boxes. But inside, they feel an undercurrent of disconnection, like they’re performing competence instead of experiencing it.

That’s meaning debt. It builds up slowly over years of pursuing the next thing without asking why. The debt comes due when that next thing no longer satisfies.

One client put it beautifully: “I keep running faster toward goals that aren’t even mine anymore.”

The good news? Meaning debt can be repaid. And not through more exhaustive effort; but through reflection.

THE IDENTITY RECKONING

The midlife awareness pivot isn’t really a career crisis; it’s an identity recalibration. The traits that once made you successful, like drive, control, perfectionism, can eventually become the very things that hold you back. The identity you built to succeed in your thirties may no longer fit the person you’re becoming in your fifties.

It’s a bit like wearing a tailored suit from ten years ago: nice quality material, but a little too tight in all the wrong places. This is where the work of coaching becomes powerful. We peel back the professional persona to rediscover who’s underneath it. I often ask clients a simple but powerful question:

“Who are you, when you’re not performing the role of leader?”

That’s where they begin reconnecting to their -ness; the unique essence that makes them who they are, beyond their title or achievements.

REIMAGINING AMBITION

Ambition doesn’t disappear in midlife; it transforms. Early ambition is about proving ourselves. Mature ambition is about expressing ourselves. It moves from upward to inward, from climbing to contributing. This doesn’t mean giving up drive or downsizing dreams. It means aligning them with what actually matters now.

Some of my clients channel their experience into mentoring or teaching. Others pursue roles that focus on purpose-driven impact instead of prestige. A few take creative or entrepreneurial leaps they’d shelved for years. Their common thread? They’re no longer chasing validation. They’re pursuing vitality.

And the irony is that once they stop performing ambition, they become more inspiring than ever.

HOW COACHING HELPS LEADERS NAVIGATE THE PIVOT

The hardest part of the midlife awareness pivot is that you can’t think your way out of it; you have to feel your way through. That’s where executive coaching helps. Together, we slow the internal noise long enough to surface what’s truly shifting underneath. We unpack the tension between old success patterns and core values. We design small, practical experiments to explore what “the next chapter” might feel like before committing to larger changes.

Research supports this process. The International Coaching Federation (2023) reports that 80% of coaching clients experience improved self-confidence and 73% report better relationships. Harvard Business Review and McKinsey have both highlighted coaching as a key driver of leadership adaptability and purpose alignment at senior levels.

This isn’t about tearing down what you’ve built. It’s about renovating it to fit who you’ve become.

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE: “WRITE YOUR FUTURE BIO”

If you’re feeling the restlessness of a midlife awareness pivot, try this:

1. Imagine it’s five years from now. You’ve made the decisions that align with your truest self; your most important values; your authentic purpose.

2. Now write the opening paragraph of your professional bio as if it were already true.
   What are you known for? What are you proud of? What have you stopped doing?

3. Read it back slowly. Notice what lights you up as you speak it. That’s where the spark of your next ambition lives.

The midlife awareness pivot isn’t the end of ambition. It’s the moment it becomes yours again.

If you’re standing at your own crossroads and ready to explore what’s next, reach out for a free exploratory Executive Coaching conversation at www.leslierohonczy.com.

THE DOWNSIDE OF RESILIENCE: When to Call ‘Uncle’ and Move On

We celebrate resilience like it’s an Olympic sport. 'Bouncing back', 'pushing through', and 'grinding away' all sound noble, but at some point, determination turns into stubbornness, and perseverance starts to work against us.

Leaders are often praised for their ability to endure the tough stuff (and we're all dealing with some really tough stuff these days, aren't we?) But the longer we’re rewarded for holding the line, the harder it becomes to recognise when the line has moved.

A STORY FROM THE COACHING ROOM

I was fortunate to work with a Director a few years ago who was leading her team through a bold (read: complex and unpopular) transformation mandate. For months, she pushed herself and her people relentlessly to get on board with the process and mindset shifts needed to make it work. When some of her peers showed signs of resistance or slowing down, she dug in even harder. As the organizational changes took shape, she was in the thick of merging teams and shifting headcount, as her span of control broadened. And like a good soldier, she absorbed all of the extra work and kept pushing for more.

At our coaching session, I asked her what mindset was driving her ‘digging in’ behaviour, and she said proudly, “I am modelling resilience for everyone around me.”

By the end of that year, a clear had pattern emerged: after a round of planned headcount reductions, some of her best employees also chose to leave, and the ones who remained were scared, disengaged, and tired. And she hadn’t taken a proper break in over a year herself! This wasn’t about demonstrating resilience anymore; she was unintentionally modelling depletion and martyrdom.

Her a-ha moment came during a triangulation meeting with me and her VP. While we were reviewing her employee engagement survey results, her VP commented, “We admire your stamina, but your team is running on fumes.” She told me afterward that, in that moment, she felt a hot wave of recognition wash over her as she realized that her definition of resilience was in fact just a marathon of sacrificial endurance for its own sake.

NAMING THE SHIFT

This is the moment where resilience starts to change shape. It is the shift from a healthy ability to adapt under stress to an overextended state where our brains and bodies begin to pay a hidden cost. Neuroscience helps explain what happens when persistence becomes counterproductive, and how our wiring pushes us to keep going even when it’s time to stop. These next three ideas reveal why that happens, and what it costs us if we ignore the signs.

• Stress physiology: Chronic exposure to stress hormones like cortisol impairs the hippocampus, the part of the brain that regulates flexibility and learning. Bruce McEwen’s research on allostatic load shows that over time, the body and mind pay a biological price for constant adaptation.

• Sunk-cost bias and reward circuitry: Once we have invested time or resources, classic sunk-cost bias kicks in, and even our reward circuits can make disengaging feel costly. Behavioral economist Daniel Kahneman and others have explored how these biases compel us to stay the course even when logic says “cut losses.”

• Cognitive narrowing: Under sustained stress, the prefrontal cortex shifts into survival mode, favoring short-term fixes and repetitive behaviors instead of creative problem-solving.

The irony is that leaders under prolonged stress often become less adaptable, the very opposite of what resilience was supposed to achieve.

WHEN RESILIENCE TURNS INTO RIGIDITY

Resilience becomes counterproductive when it crosses the invisible line from resourcefulness to resistance.

• Fighting sunk costs: “We’ve invested too much to stop now” becomes a badge of honour.

• Over-functioning: Leaders take on more and more to keep things afloat, unintentionally teaching their teams to rely on them.

• Modelling burnout: Teams mirror what they see. When leaders glorify endurance, employees learn that exhaustion equals commitment.

• Avoiding change: Perseverance turns into attachment to the familiar. “This is how we’ve always done it” starts to sound like leadership wisdom.

Organizational psychologist Barry Staw first described this pattern as escalation of commitment, and it has been widely popularized by several thought leaders, including Adam Grant. The message is clear: the longer we persist, the harder it becomes to admit that persistence itself might be the problem.

A TALE OF TWO COMPANIES

In the early 2000s, Kodak epitomized corporate resilience. It survived countless market shifts over a century by doubling down on what it knew best: film. The company even invented the first digital camera in 1975 and buried it. Why? Because the business model of selling film was too entrenched to abandon. Resilience had hardened into rigidity.

By contrast, Netflix faced similar uncertainty when DVD rentals began to decline. Instead of doubling down on its original model, it bet on streaming and later, original content. The difference wasn’t intelligence or resources; it was psychological flexibility.

Leaders who treat resilience as an identity often cling to what worked before. Leaders who treat it as a tool know when to put it down.

CULTURAL RESEARCH

The World Health Organization officially classified burnout as an occupational phenomenon in 2019, defining it as “chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed.”

Canadian data show sustained strain. In May 2024, one third of Canadian workers were in a high mental-health risk category, underscoring the real cost of endurance without recovery. Yet in leadership programs and performance reviews, “resilience” remains one of the most celebrated traits.

Maybe it’s time we stopped glorifying it and started interrogating it.

THE NEUROSCIENCE OF RECOVERY

Recovery isn’t weakness; it’s recalibration.

• Rest and neuroplasticity: Sleep and rest restore the prefrontal cortex’s ability to integrate complex data and manage emotional regulation.

• Emotional regulation: Activities like mindfulness, music, and physical exercise reduce amygdala hyperactivity and reset attention systems.

• Perspective shifting: Downtime activates the brain’s default network, which supports perspective shifting, creativity, empathy, and strategic insight.

Leaders who build recovery into their rhythm are not “less driven.” They are creating the mental conditions for adaptability, the real heart of resilience.

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE

Practice: Persistence or Rigidity?

Doing:
Identify one initiative you are holding onto mainly out of persistence. Define three signals that would justify pivoting or letting go and share them with a trusted peer or mentor.

What to Notice:

• What emotions surface when I imagine stepping back from this initiative?

• Do my reasons for continuing come from purpose, pride, or fear of loss?

• How does my team respond when I talk about this work, with energy or fatigue?

Reflection Questions:

1. What assumptions am I holding onto tightly that no longer serve?

2. What would it take to release this project with grace and redirect energy elsewhere?

3. Who could give me honest feedback on whether it is time to pivot?

4. What might become possible if I stopped equating resilience with endurance?

True resilience is not about bouncing back or enduring more... it’s about knowing when to bend, when to rest, and when to pivot and move on with intention.  It’s the wisdom and courage to release what no longer serves.

Reach out for a free exploratory Executive Coaching conversation. Email: leslierohonczy@live.com

DEVELOPING YOUR BULLSH*T DETECTOR: Cutting Through Hype, Jargon, and Polished Nonsense in 2025

“Revolutionary! Transformative!! Game-changing!!!” If you hear those words in the first five minutes of a pitch, your inner alarm bell should be ringing. We’ve all sat through those pitches. The buzzwords fly, the slides look amazing, and for a moment you catch yourself nodding along. But jargon doesn’t equal substance.

Leaders at WeWork once talked about “elevating the world’s consciousness,” while selling what was essentially office space with free beer. Investors bought the story, not the fundamentals, and the company’s $47-billion valuation evaporated almost overnight. Even smart executives can get dazzled by shiny language and big promises. That is why developing a BS detector is not a luxury in 2025; it is a leadership survival skill.

A MAGICAL METAPHOR TO REMEMBER

Think of a magician’s sleight of hand. The flourish distracts your eyes while the real trick happens elsewhere. Corporate spin works the same way. A charismatic founder’s over-hyped vision, a glossy report with flawless graphics and no meat, or an “innovation lab” demo of the best case scenario can all act like the magician’s flourish. They dazzle us so we don’t notice what is missing: evidence, substance, or common sense.

WHY OUR BRAINS GET FOOLED

Neuroscience offers some clues as to why BS is so effective at sneaking past smart people.

• Halo effect: When something looks polished, we assume it must also be competent. The brain’s shortcut is ‘shiny equals credible’.

• Amygdala and certainty: Under stress, our amygdala is activated, and we crave certainty. A slick answer feels like relief from the stress, even if it is hollow.

• Dopamine hits: Novelty lights up our reward system, giving us a rush that feels like progress. “New and improved” is rocket fuel for our brains.

• Social proof: If others nod along, our reward system pushes us to conform. Our need to belong can trump our instinct to question.

This is why entire boards, investment funds, and senior leadership teams can all walk straight into illusions without a single person stopping to ask, “Wait, does this actually make sense?”

FIVE FILTER QUESTIONS

To cut through the illusion, try this lens:

1. What evidence supports this claim?

2. How would it work in practice, not just theory?

3. What problem does it actually solve?

4. Who benefits most if we do this?

5. If it fails, what is Plan B?

Asking even one of these questions often changes the entire conversation. Suddenly the flourish disappears, and the real substance is revealed.

CULTURAL RELEVANCE

Robert Cialdini’s research on persuasion shows how the halo effect can blind us to flaws in logic. And Daniel Kahneman’s work on decision fatigue is clear: we stop asking clarifying questions when our mental energy is low.

History is littered with cautionary tales. Nikola Motors once released a video of its zero-emission truck cruising down a highway. The catch: it was rolling downhill with no powertrain. Investors believed the story, and the company briefly hit a $30-billion valuation before reality set in. Nikola is a reminder that polish and storytelling can deceive even the most seasoned executives.

And there’s no shortage of examples: Juicero raised over $100 million for a Wi-Fi-connected juicer, only for customers to discover they could squeeze the juice packs by hand; Theranos promised hundreds of blood tests from a single drop, fooling investors and board members across multiple industries; and FTX was once valued at $32 billion before collapsing into one of the biggest financial frauds in recent history.

Each case shows how leaders can be seduced by big promises and polished delivery, only to see their budgets and credibility evaporate when the truth emerges.

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE

Practice: The Clarity Filter

Doing:
In your next three meetings, ask at least one of the five filter questions listed above. Write down what shifted in the conversation when you did.

What to Notice:

• What shifts in the energy of the room after you ask the question

• How the explanation of the idea evolves once it was explored more deeply?

• People’s body language or tone, and what new perspective it can give you about their level of confidence or conviction

Reflection Questions:

1. What surprised me about how people responded to my question?

2. How did the question change the conversation in ways I did not expect?

3. What did I learn about the strength, relevance, or practicality of the idea being discussed?

4. What does this tell me about my own comfort with disrupting group consensus?

We don’t need to become cynical skeptics, but in a world where polish is cheap and empty promises are plentiful, we do need sharper questions.

Reach out for a free exploratory Executive Coaching conversation at www.leslierohonczy.com

THE GREAT MEETING REBELLION: Breaking Free from Calendar Captivity

If your calendar feels like it belongs to everyone but you, you are not alone. Most of us are trapped in ‘calendar captivity’: meeting after meeting, hour after hour, leaving no oxygen for strategy, reflection, spontaneous co-creation with others, or leadership development. But take heart; cracks are forming in this culture of calendar worship, and the great meeting rebellion has begun!

AN EVERYDAY OBSERVATION

I was recently standing in line at Bridgehead waiting for my tea, when I overheard two men comparing notes about who had more meetings that week. Clearly, it was a competition! They were bragging about whose calendar was more dense, as if a suffocating schedule and meeting fatigue were badges of honour, or the way to prove their value and importance. What a crock. Ever wonder how we got to the point that our working culture has normalised busyness as a way to demonstrate our significance or importance, even when it adds no value? Let’s look at the data.

THE DATA BEHIND IT

• Microsoft’s Work Trend Index shows meeting time has tripled since 2020.

• Harvard Business School found that 71% of managers consider meetings inefficient.

• And a global survey of knowledge workers by Atlassian, the Australian software company behind Jira, Confluence, and Trello, found that employees lose about 31 hours per month to unproductive meetings and communication.

THE NEUROSCIENCE OF MEETING OVERLOAD

Neuroscience also helps explain why endless meetings feel so exhausting. Our brains are not designed to shift focus dozens of times a day, nor to make decisions without breaks or downtime. When calendars are packed with back-to-back meetings, there are several predictable effects that can show up in our brains:

• Decision fatigue: Each meeting requires choices, and the prefrontal cortex tires quickly. Later in the day, people tend to make more default or shallow decisions. Leadership experts such as Dr. David Rock of the NeuroLeadership Institute recommend scheduling your most important decisions for the morning, when mental energy is highest.

• Directed attention fatigue: Constantly forcing focus drains the part of the brain that helps us manage attention and regulate emotions. When it is overtaxed, our ability to listen generously and respond thoughtfully decreases, which is why people become more irritable, less empathetic, and quicker to snap during back-to-back meetings.

• Default mode network: This brain network switches on when we are not focused on a specific task, such as when daydreaming, walking, showering, running, or letting our minds wander. It is critical for creativity, reflection, and for connecting disparate ideas. When calendars are overpacked, the default mode network doesn’t have the chance to activate, which means we lose the mental space where many of our best insights would normally emerge.

PUBLIC EXAMPLES OF PUSHBACK

Shopify made headlines in 2023 by introducing a ‘calendar purge’ in early 2023, cancelling many recurring meetings with more than two people, enforcing a meeting-free day (Wednesdays), and limiting large gatherings. I don’t know if that policy is still in place (perhaps someone from Spotify can chime in below), but at the time, the changes yielded a measurable drop in meeting overload, and it got people talking about meeting necessity.

Deloitte Canada’s hybrid work-research shows employees increasingly value flexibility and well-being, and many describe strain from coordination overload and excessive meetings. Leaders are responding with bold resets: no-meeting days, mandatory agendas, decision-only rules.

WHAT THE REBELLION LOOKS LIKE

Leaders who have begun to push back against calendar overload are not doing it with small tweaks. They are redesigning how time is used, putting in place clear rules and experiments that challenge the default culture of ‘meetings first.’ The rebellion is not about eliminating every meeting; rather, it’s about treating each one as a costly investment of attention that must earn its place on the calendar.

Here are some of the strategies that are gaining traction:

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE

Reclaim the Calendar

Doing:
For the next two weeks, conduct a personal calendar audit. Label every meeting as one of three types:

• A = Action (a decision or choice needs to be made)

• C = Check-in (information-only updates needed)

• T = Transfer (asynchronous: share documents, Slack, or AI-generated notes).

Cancel or reframe at least one meeting in each category. For example, shift an information meeting into a written update, or shorten a decision meeting by clarifying the decision before it begins.

What to Notice:

• When a meeting is labelled as Action, did it truly lead to a clear decision or next step?

• For Check-in meetings, did the conversation actually create alignment, or could the same update have been delivered another way?

• For Transfer items, what happened when I moved them out of the calendar and into a written or asynchronous channel?

• How did my focus, energy, or availability shift as I applied the ACT filter across my schedule?

Reflection Questions:

1. Which meetings truly belonged in the Action category, and which ones slipped in without a real decision attached?

2. How much value did my Check-in meetings add, and where did I see opportunities to streamline or shorten them?

3. What did I learn about the effectiveness of moving Transfer items into asynchronous channels?

4. How did applying ACT change my sense of control over my calendar?

5. If I made ACT a habit across my team, how might it shift the culture of meetings in my organisation?

 The most radical leadership act of 2025 may be refusing to waste your professional life in bad meetings.

Reach out for a free exploratory Executive Coaching conversation at www.leslierohonczy.com.

SILENT DEALBREAKERS: Invisible Habits That Kill Your Leadership Brand

You can deliver flawless results and still stall your career. You can ace the big presentation and still erode trust. You can check every box on the leadership competency list and still be overlooked. Why? Because invisible habits can quietly chip away at your credibility, until they become silent dealbreakers.

A STORY CLOSE TO HOME

Years ago, I was the Director of IT Strategy at one of Canada’s Crown corporations. One of my peers, who I considered a good friend, pulled me aside after I presented to the executive team and said, “Leslie, do you realise you often end your thoughts with, ‘Does that make sense?’ It’s killing your credibility a little bit each time.” I was so surprised! I had no idea I was doing it. To me, it just seemed like a friendly, humble way to check in, but in reality, it was diluting my voice, and making it sound like I was doubting myself, or worse, doubting my audience’s ability to follow along.

Within weeks of paying attention to that little phrase and what was driving it, I was able to drop the habit. Mostly. (Full disclosure, it still creeps into my conversations now and then... does that make sense?) And something unexpected happened as a result: I noticed others leaning in more, opening up to me in new ways, asking me to expand on my points, trusting me with their difficult issues.

THE PERCEPTION GAP

Tasha Eurich’s research in Harvard Business Review found that while 95% of people believe they are self-aware, only about 10–15% actually are (HBR, 2018). In fact, many leaders significantly overestimate how positively they are perceived by their peers, and more than half of us assume we are coming across stronger than we are. This perception gap is where silent dealbreakers thrive.

We have perception gaps because people often feel uncomfortable pointing out our weaknesses or blind spots. It’s not often that someone and has our back enough to tell us, “Hey, your hedging language is eroding trust.” Instead, they keep that valuable information to themselves, affecting their perception of us, and that’s going to have an impact: a peer stops inviting you into early-stage brainstorming because they sense hesitation; a direct report chooses not to share an innovative idea with you because they’re unsure how you’ll respond; a board member wonders why you don’t speak with more conviction; a client feels less trust in you with the bigger piece of their business.

This pattern is rarely named. But you will feel the consequences later; the missed opportunities, the roles or projects that quietly go to someone else, the sense that your influence is not growing at the pace it should.

THE BRAIN’S ROLE IN MICRO-MOMENTS

Since I’m a neuroscience factoid junkie, let’s unpack a few principles to understand how our brain signals can betray us, what silent signals it monitors, and why small habits matter so much.

• Mirror neurons: These fire when we observe behaviour in others. If you appear disengaged, colleagues unconsciously mirror it, and the whole room’s energy drops.

• Amygdala sensitivity: The amygdala, our threat-detection system, is highly attuned to incongruence. If you promise something and then fail to follow through, others’ trust circuits register it as a red flag.

• Prefrontal fatigue: Our prefrontal cortex tires quickly, especially under stress. That’s when we slip into filler language, avoidance, or multitasking. Others notice these lapses, even when we’re unaware of them.

• Oxytocin and trust: Oxytocin is a chemical released in our brains and bodies during positive, consistent social interactions. It supports bonding, reliability, and connection. When our behaviour feels inconsistent or unpredictable, the social signals that trigger oxytocin are disrupted, and people feel less inclined to trust us deeply.

These insights matter because they explain why small, often invisible behaviours carry so much weight. Your brain’s signals are constantly broadcasting cues about presence, reliability, and congruence, and everyone else’s brains are tuned to receive them. That’s why the micro-moments you think no one notices can shape the story people tell about your leadership. Understanding what drives those signals gives you the power to recalibrate them intentionally, before they become silent dealbreakers.

A WATCH LIST OF INVISIBLE HABITS

Here are a few examples of the most common silent dealbreakers I see in coaching leaders:

• Hedging language: “I might be wrong, but…” (which is similar to my old ‘Does that make sense’ line). It was said by a senior VP in a merger meeting. His team later stopped fighting for his ideas because he didn’t sound confident in them.

• Dropping commitments: A Director who routinely promised to “circle back tomorrow” but rarely did. Her reliability rating tanked with the other Directors in her group, even though she saw herself as responsive.

• Unintentional interrupting: An executive who habitually cut people off mid-sentence thought he was helping the conversation to move along faster (his communication style preference). His team described him as dismissive and over-bearing.

• Being physically present but mentally elsewhere: A leader in a hybrid meeting who often answered text messages while her team presented their project updates. Employees stopped tracking their progress, which created an unnecessary risk to the team’s key projects. “Why bother, if she is not listening?”

• Inconsistent tone: A VP who alternated between being approachable one week and grumpy the next. People stopped confiding in him because they never knew which version they would get, and his unpredictability felt risky.

CULTURAL RESEARCH

Gallup’s State of the Global Workplace 2023 found that employees are nearly four times more likely to be engaged when leaders consistently follow through on their promises. Consistency, even in small commitments like returning a call when promised, matters more than grand gestures.

And it turns out that reliability is a stronger predictor of engagement than charisma or vision. A Deloitte Insights survey on trust in leadership (2022) reported that 79% of employees who viewed their leaders as reliable also rated their organisations as “highly engaging places to work.”

Research from the Center for Creative Leadership has also shown that leaders who demonstrate behavioural consistency are rated significantly higher in effectiveness by both peers and direct reports. Those small patterns, like showing up prepared, or keeping one’s word, compound into reputational capital.

Put together, the message is clear that organisations reward leaders who eliminate silent dealbreakers. Reliability is not just a personal virtue; it is cultural currency.

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE

Spot Your Silent Dealbreakers

Doing:
For the next week, ask two trusted colleagues to observe you in meetings and interactions. Invite them to share one or two small habits that might unintentionally dilute your credibility (hedging language, inconsistent tone, multitasking, etc.). Choose one of these habits and commit to experimenting with it for seven days.

What to Notice:

• How often does the habit show up when you are under stress or pressed for time?

• What changes in the energy of the room when you catch yourself and shift?

• Do colleagues respond differently when you deliver a point with clarity instead of hedging, or when you follow through consistently?

Reflection Questions:

1. Which micro-habit surfaced most often this week, and do you notice any themes or patterns?

2. What impact did you observe in others’ responses when you shifted it?

3. How did it feel internally to hold yourself differently?

4. What would it take to make this shift sustainable?

5. Which other micro-habit might be worth experimenting with next?

This practice is not about eliminating every habit at once. It is about raising awareness and testing whether small, consistent shifts create visible changes in how others experience you.

 Your leadership brand is not built in keynotes or strategy decks. It is built in micro-moments. The question is, are your moments compounding your credibility or eroding it?

If you’re interested in executive coaching to help you address your silent deal-breakers, reach out for a free exploratory conversation at www.leslierohonczy.com.

I BELONG HERE: Build Confidence by Shifting from 'Guest' To 'Host'

Your heart is racing, your palms are clammy, and all the right words seem to be missing in action. Sitting at a table full of senior leaders, waiting for your turn to speak, you feel like a guest at a fancy party: not quite dressed for the occasion, unsure if anyone knows your name, polite and tentative, careful not to spill the wine. All the while, that familiar whisper rises inside you: Do I belong here?

We all know this moment. I’ve coached many executives and senior leaders who’ve felt it too. The irony is that it shows up most often when we’ve already earned our seat: we got the promotion, the board role, the invitation to join the executive table. What's with that?

The bad news: that whisper may never fully go away.
The good news: you get to decide how to respond to it.

FROM GUEST TO HOST

That feeling of belonging doesn’t come from a title, a business card, or a corner office. It’s shaped by your stance at the table, built through the contributions you make once you’re there. Ask yourself in those moments: "Am I showing up as a guest, or as a host?"

I used these powerful metaphors with an executive I coached, who was recently promoted to the Executive team, and who was working on building her confidence. In her first few months, she rarely spoke up. She waited to be asked for her input, believing that restraint would signal professionalism. Instead, her peers interpreted her silence as disengagement or aloofness.

Things began to shift when she started observing herself in action, specifically looking for how she was showing up as a guest, and then intentionally stepping into the role of a host. A guest is tentative, waiting to be invited, careful not to impose. Guests are polite and reactive, hoping not to stand out for the wrong reasons. By contrast, a host sets the tone, sparks conversation, and takes responsibility for creating an experience where everyone feels included. When she began preparing a few thoughtful contributions before executive meetings, she was no longer just occupying a seat. She was shaping the conversation and beginning the shift from guest energy to host energy, and towards her aspirational future state as an executive.

THE CURRENCY OF CONTRIBUTION

Think about the difference between passively taking a seat and actively shaping the table. Holding back, being overly careful about overstepping, or waiting for an invitation can keep us small and safe, but it also keeps us from having real influence.

Leaders who thrive step into their host energy. They don’t just sit at the table, they set it. They frame the conversation, draw others in, and make sure the best ideas get amplified. Hosting isn’t about control, it’s about responsibility. Hosts don’t wait to be asked, they create the conditions where others can flourish.

And here’s the twist: once you step into host energy, belonging stops being only about you. You start generating it for others. When you model confidence, welcome diverse voices, courageously challenge, and guide dialogue with intention, you create a ripple effect of belonging that strengthens the entire room.

FROM WHISPER TO BELONGING

That whisper of “Do I belong here?” probably won’t disappear. But the answer doesn’t come from waiting for reassurance or hoping someone else will validate you. It comes from practice: showing up prepared, contributing consistently, and daring to claim your space. Each time you step into host energy rather than guest energy, you strengthen your confidence and reshape the dynamic around you.

Your confidence will grow in the doing: it's forged when you speak even with shaky hands, when you extend an invitation for others to contribute, when you steady the table instead of waiting for someone else to do it. Those small choices compound into presence, credibility, and trust.

Every time you do, you reinforce a deeper truth: you don’t just belong here. You are actively shaping what “here” becomes for everyone at the table.

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE

At your next high-stakes meeting, pause and ask yourself: Am I showing up like a guest, or a host?

• If you’re sitting quietly, waiting for the right moment, experiment with contributing earlier: offer an insight, frame a key question, invite opinions, or connect threads others haven’t linked.

• If you usually focus only on your own points, try curating: draw someone else in, amplify a quieter voice, or summarize the room’s emerging consensus.

Notice how these shifts not only change your own sense of belonging but also elevate the experience of everyone at the table.

Because having the confidence to belong isn’t a gift; it’s a practice. And when you practice it well, you won’t just whisper “I belong here.” You’ll embody it and set an example that invites others to do the same.

Reach out for a free exploratory conversation at www.leslierohonczy.com.

WHEN TYPE BECOMES STEREOTYPE: The Problem with Over-Generalized Labels

“I start tuning out when type becomes stereotype.” That line came from my fellow Integral Master Coach, Michael Lamberti, during a recent exchange we had on LinkedIn, and I haven’t stopped thinking about it. In his post, Michael noted that some psychometrics teachers make irresponsible generalizations about their tools. And he’s right. I attended a workshop where a teacher told us that a certain personality type only had half of their emotions to work with. It made me roll my eyes so hard I could see my brain.

Personality frameworks and psychometric tools can be game-changing in leadership development, but when type turns into stereotype, we stop seeing the human being in front of us. It’s like mistaking a rough sketch for a finished painting. And when frameworks are distilled down too far, they risk becoming little more than an over-generalized sketch of the individual.

I’ve seen it happen in my work with teams, too. Someone reads their Enneagram Type 7 description to the group, and everyone around them assumes they must be the extroverted life of the party. A leader is tagged as an Insights “Cool Blue,” so the unspoken expectation is that they’ll be meticulous, logical, and great at budgets. Or someone is identified as a Myers-Briggs 'ENTJ,' and the stereotype is that they’ll automatically be a bold, take-charge executive. The problem is that these shorthand labels can blind us to a richer sense of a person's wiring: their values, communication preferences, decision-making styles, quirks, blind spots, limiting beliefs, assumptions, and untapped strengths. When we collapse someone down to the boilerplate description of a single 'type', we miss the richer, more complex portrait right in front of us.

THE DANGER OF ONE-DIMENSIONAL LABELS

Psychometric tools have enormous value. I use them frequently in designing coaching programs to meet my clients where they are, and to help me calibrate our live 1:1 coaching sessions. These tools can shine a light on how we process information, what motivates us, and how we’re wired under stress. But even when we make use of all the rich and robust aspects of a single psychometric model, it still offers just one window into a person. To see someone fully, we need to look through multiple lenses, each revealing different aspects of who they are and how they show up.

The danger comes when we let that single lens define the person. A DISC “C” detail-oriented leader may not actually be strong at planning or follow-through. An “influencing” style might not guarantee charisma or natural leadership. Labelling in this way becomes lazy shorthand and robs us of the deeper nuances of the real, evolving human sitting across from us. This is often how stereotypes are born: each of these psychometric tools has robust depth, with multiple layers of nuance and insight, but when people only memorize or repeat the surface-level summary, the richness is lost, and a flat stereotype takes its place.

This isn’t a new problem. Research on personality assessments has long cautioned against treating results as static or predictors of success. These tools reveal tendencies and preferences, not absolutes. And yet, I still hear leaders in meetings say things like: “Oh, she’s an Insights Yellow, she’ll love this project,” or “He’s an Enneagram 9, so conflict will always be hard for him,” or “Her Myers-Briggs ‘I’ is too high to be successful in that role.” That’s not development; that’s stereotyping.

WHY A DASHBOARD IS BETTER THAN A SINGLE GAUGE

Think about the dashboard in your car. When going on a road trip, you wouldn’t rely only on the speedometer and ignore the fuel gauge, oil pressure, or engine lights. Understanding people (and ourselves) also requires us to pay attention to a dashboard of indicators.

Here’s what that looks like in practice:

• Psychometrics give you a single lens on patterns and preferences.

• Feedback (formal and informal) gives you an external lens.

• Self-observation exercises looking for patterns and behaviours adds a third.

• Context and environment matter too; how someone shows up can shift depending on culture, stress, and team dynamics.

• Values and motivators offer another gauge, revealing what drives someone beneath the surface.

• Experimentation shows you what happens when you try something new, then reflect on the gap between what you expected and what actually happened.

• Coaching conversations, 360s, and stretch assignments each add data points to your dashboard.

The more gauges you can read, the more accurate your navigation becomes. Lean on just one, and you may think you’re cruising along safely, while in reality you’re going to run out of fuel in 20 kilometers.

MICHAEL LAMBERTI ON THE ENNEAGRAM

This is where I circle back to Michael’s terrific work with the Enneagram, a tool that, when used to its full depth, can surface profound insights about motivation and growth edges. It’s one of the most accurate and robust psychometric tools out there. But his caution is the same as mine: reducing people to stereotypes does them a tremendous disservice. If you’re curious to go deeper into the Enneagram and its applications for leadership, I encourage you to check out Michael Lamberti’s offerings on Substack and LinkedIn. He’s an excellent resource.

SO WHAT SHOULD LEADERS DO?

If you’re a leader using psychometric results to guide development, here’s my invitation:

• Treat assessments as conversation starters, not finish lines.

• Resist the urge to let a label explain away deeper nuances or complexity.

• Stay curious about contradictions: the “introvert” who loves public speaking, the “detail person” who thrives in chaos.

Your team is made up of multi-layered, surprising, sometimes contradictory human beings. Honour that complexity. When type becomes stereotype, you stop seeing potential. But when type is just one gauge on a broader dashboard, you get a far truer picture of the leader – and the person – in front of you.

And when it comes to your own development, choose a coach who works with multiple lenses. A one-dimensional coaching approach will give you a single rough sketch of yourself, which may or may not be useful. The most effective coaches bring in a variety of perspectives and lenses. In Integral Coaching, for example, we look through six interwoven lenses and more than 20 sub-lenses that explore different dimensions of a client’s way of being. Executive coaching then adds further angles such as live observation, feedback, and triangulation with the client’s leader, reflection on developmental objectives, and real-world experimentation. Together, this layered approach offers a far more complete picture of who someone is and how they can grow.

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE

This week, make it a practice to notice when you or others fall into shorthand labelling. Each time you hear someone say, “She’s a Yellow,” or “He’s so Type 8,” pause and treat it as a piece of data – but not the whole story. Your challenge is to experiment with the mindset that ‘people are layered, dynamic, and evolving’ in your daily interactions.

Here’s how:

1. Observe one colleague through the lens you normally use, and label them. For example, my go-to lens is the Enneagram, so I would choose a person, and label them with what I think is their Ennea-type (E7w6).

2. Now, look at that colleague through at least three different lenses (eg: their behaviour under stress, their underlying motivators, their communication style, their values, their interpersonal skills, the cultural or team context they’re operating within, their internal mindset or state, and the systems or structures influencing them). These additional perspectives reflect the inner world, outer behaviour, relationships, and environment, all shaping who someone is and how they show up.

3. Journal a brief reflection: What were the built-in assumptions you made when you first typed them? What additional insights came when you looked again through additional lenses? Where did your assumptions limit your ability to see them fully before?

4. Next, try a small experiment in a conversation with this person: frame a question that draws out the very differences you noticed in your reflection. For example, if you assumed they were detail-oriented but discovered they are more motivated by big picture impact, ask what outcomes feel most meaningful to them. If you assumed they avoid conflict but saw signs of strongly held values under pressure, ask what principles guide them when the stakes are high. Pay attention to how their answers confirm, challenge, or expand your assumptions, and consider how you might adjust your approach to meet them where they actually are, rather than where you thought they were.

People are never one-dimensional. They are shaped by inner states, observable behaviours, relationships, and environments. When you consciously widen your view, you start to see the whole layered painting rather than just the roughly sketched outline.

If you’d like support building your own dashboard of lenses and experimenting with them in real life, reach out for a free exploratory conversation at www.leslierohonczy.com. I’d love to be your coach.

WHEN CANDOUR BACKFIRES: The Risk of Being “Too Real” At Work

Every leader knows that knot-in-the-stomach feeling before saying something tough. You spot a flaw in the strategy your boss is championing. You need to tell a high performer that their style is alienating the team. Or you’re about to voice the only dissenting view in a room full of nodding heads. These moments test your courage. And they test your skill. Because candour can land like a gift or a gut punch.

WHEN CANDOUR CLOSES DOORS

I once worked with a talented, passionate woman who proudly called herself a “straight-talker.” Her feedback was always honest and never sugar-coated and many colleagues, including me, valued her candour, even if it was sometimes hard to hear. She genuinely believed that being blunt built trust. The problem? Over time, some of her colleagues started describing her as prickly, demanding, and impossible to please. She had strong ideas about what needed to change, but no one wanted to listen. Her accuracy wasn’t the problem. Her delivery was.

That’s what happens when candour is used like a blunt instrument. We think we’re being authentic, but what others hear is harshness or judgment. Instead of opening doors, it slams them shut.

Bravery and bluntness aren’t the same thing. Saying the tough thing in its rawest form isn’t courageous, it’s lazy, and it often triggers defensiveness, sidelining the very point we’re trying to make. When people feel attacked, their stress response kicks in: cortisol spikes, reasoning plummets, and they literally can’t process what we’re saying. The harder we push, the more they resist. Real bravery is being intentional and skilful, delivering the hard truth in ways that keep people open long enough to be able to take it in.

Harvard’s Professor of Leadership Amy Edmondson has shown through her groundbreaking research on psychological safety that people can only absorb tough feedback when they feel safe in the relationship. Neuroscience confirms this: when people feel threatened, cortisol floods the system and reasoning goes offline. Practical tools like the SBI model (Situation–Behaviour–Impact) help ground feedback in specifics, while Kim Scott’s Radical Candor highlights that true candour means challenging directly while caring personally. Used together, these insights show that candour done well strikes a balance that keeps people open rather than defensive.

I once worked with a senior leader at a Canadian non-profit who needed to push back on her board chair’s aggressive expansion plans. Her instinct was to challenge him directly at the next Board meeting, but she understood that would likely create resistance. Instead, she framed her intent around protecting the organisation’s reputation, backed her points with financial data, and raised her deeper leadership concerns privately. The conversation led to a more sustainable plan. No fireworks, no fallout, just progress.

Candour only works if the other person stays open. That means paying attention to how, when, and where you say it. Here are a few ways to do that:

• Frame your intent. Signal why you’re raising the issue. “I want to flag something that could help us avoid risk.” That shifts you from critic to ally, putting you on the same side of the table, looking at the problem together.

• Ground in specifics. Vague feedback invites defensiveness. Concrete examples invite reflection.

• Ask questions. They turn confrontation into collaboration. “What do you think was happening there?” lands differently than “You always interrupt.”

• Pick your stage wisely. Some truths belong in private, not in front of a crowd. If your feedback could cause embarrassment or touches on personal behaviours, it should be delivered one-on-one rather than in a group setting.

• Choose timing with care. At the end of a long day, or during a challenging event, even valid feedback can feel like an attack.

• Balance candour with care. Acknowledge strengths or intentions alongside the tough message.

• Check your motive. Are you trying to help, or just venting? Only the first one builds trust.

• Watch non-verbals. Notice body language and tone to gauge how your message is landing. And don’t assume you’re right. Check in and ask.

WHEN “TOO REAL” IS JUST SELF-INDULGENT

We’ve all heard someone brush off someone’s reaction to their harsh comments with, “I’m just being real.” At first, that sounds admirable. Who doesn’t want authenticity? But “being real” can quickly become careless. If your candour leaves people bruised, blindsided, or frustrated, that’s not candour. That’s self-indulgence. Dumping unfiltered thoughts might clear your conscience, but it won’t build trust.

Real candour is relational in that it makes your message useful for the person receiving it. That means choosing words that invite reflection, balancing critique with acknowledgement of strengths, and checking if the timing will allow the other person to take it in fully. Without this calibration step, “just being real” is just offloading.

TWO SIDES OF THE CANDOUR COIN

One senior leader I coached was working on taking up her full leadership space in her new role on the executive team. She realized that she needed to give her peers feedback that their aversion to risk was stifling innovation. “We’ve always done it this way” had become the default mindset, and any fresh ideas from below were met with suspicion or dismissed as too ‘out there’.

Her instinct at first was to stay quiet, to avoid being labelled as disruptive or reckless. Instead, we focused on carefully preparing her for this crucial conversation. During the executive committee meeting, she clarified her motives and framed her candour as being in service of the organisation’s growth. She highlighted specific missed opportunities and tied them to the organisation’s own goals around customer growth. Because she chose her timing and messaging wisely, her peers stayed open. What could have been dismissed as contrarian turned into a real conversation about risk-friendly, test-and-learn innovation pilots.

Another executive client faced the opposite issue. He had a reputation for sharp wit and “telling it like it is.” His communication style got laughs, but it also made colleagues become guarded around him, nervous at the prospect of becoming his next punchline.

Over time, he realised that his humour was a shield for his own insecurity about being challenged. Jokes let him stay one step ahead of others and avoid vulnerability. Once he understood that pattern, he experimented with softening his delivery, clarifying his intent, and creating space for others to respond. By taking the risk of being more open, he shifted from sarcastic critic to trusted challenger, and his candour started to build, rather than break, relationships.

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE

Candour is essential for trust, culture, and performance. Without it, leaders become echo chambers. With it, they spark growth, accountability, and innovation. The risk lies in mistaking candour for a licence to say whatever you want, without considering how it will land with others.

Here’s a quick practice that combines courage with care:

1. Identify your audience. Ask yourself: Is this the right audience, and the right moment for them?

2. Check your motive. Are you speaking to help the other person grow, or to clear your own frustration?

3. Frame your intent. Start with why you are raising it, so the other person knows your purpose is constructive.

4. Ground in specifics. Share clear examples of what you saw or heard and describe the impact.

5. Balance with care. Acknowledge a strength or positive intent alongside your challenge.

6. Ask, don’t tell. Invite reflection with a question that keeps the door open.

7. Pair challenge with care. As you raise the hard message, make it clear you respect and value them, and you genuinely care about them.

8. Reflect and revise. Notice what happens: do people lean in and open into conversation, or shut down and disengage? The difference will tell you how skilfully you’ve used candour.

Candour is a leadership skill that can build trust and momentum when used with care, or that can erode relationships when used carelessly. Mastering the art of speaking truth to power with the right amount of candour can be a real career booster when done well. If you want to strengthen your ability to deliver tough truths in ways that keep people open and engaged, executive coaching can help. Reach out for a free exploratory conversation at www.leslierohonczy.com to learn how coaching can support your leadership growth.

THE KNOWING-DOING GAP: When Insight Does Not Create Impact

In my coaching work, I meet many leaders who already have loads of insight. In fact, can’t count the number of times a client has said to me, “I know what I should be doing… I’m just not doing it.” They’ll even rattle off (cue ominous music) “the list”: delegate more, ask better questions, listen to understand, stop over-functioning, have the tough conversation, get out of the weeds, make time for strategy.

They can talk about these things eloquently. They’ve attended the workshops, read the books, or journaled about it on a retreat. But when Monday morning rolls around and their calendars fill with the usual urgent meetings, all that knowing and good intentions get choked out by old habits and urgent priorities. And when one of those priorities starts flaming, it’s hard to remember what we ‘know’ but haven’t quite ‘embodied’ yet. And for many leaders, that’s where progress stalls.

The struggle to turn knowing into consistent behavioural change is real. Researchers Jeffrey Pfeffer and Robert Sutton at Stanford call this the knowing–doing gap – the persistent tendency for organizations and individuals to know what to do, but failing to act on it.

WHY KNOWING IS NOT ENOUGH

Pfeffer and Sutton’s research showed that the problem isn’t knowledge, it’s follow-through. Leaders nod along in agreement during training, then return to business as usual.

Neuroscience helps explain why. Aha moments have been linked to activity in our reward circuits, which helps to explain why it feels so good when we have an insight. That spike of reward makes us feel like something has shifted, but unless it’s paired with concrete practice, the idea remains an “interesting thought” rather than becoming encoded in us as a new behaviour.

In other words, insight is the spark, but repetition is the fuel.

DANIEL’S STORY: FROM INSIGHT TO IMPACT

My client Daniel had been in his VP role for 3 years. During a triangulation meeting at the kick-off of our coaching program, Daniel’s leader told me that he was a brilliant strategist, and deeply respected, but she worried about his pacing because he often seemed exhausted. At our next session, I asked Daniel about that comment, and he told me, “I know I should be delegating more, but when the stakes are high, it just feels faster if I do it myself.” His team had stopped bringing him fully formed solutions because they knew he’d jump in and fix things anyway, so why bother?

We didn’t start with a grand delegation overhaul. Instead, Daniel chose one recurring meeting (a weekly project status update from his team) and agreed to limit his contributions to clarifying questions only. No problem-solving, no swooping in to rescue, no taking the wheel because ‘his way’ was the ‘right way’. Just genuinely curious questions intended to help his team think more deeply about their progress.

The first week of experimenting was painful. “I bit my tongue so hard I thought it might bleed”, he told me in our next session. His team knew something felt different, but didn’t know quite what to make of this different version of Daniel. They presented their updates, looked at him for answers, and the silence made him squirmy – his people too. But he sat in the discomfort of it and managed to stay quiet.

By the third week, something shifted: one of his directors spoke up with a decision Daniel would normally have made. Another shared a bold idea that improved the way they did project oversight. Daniel told me later, “They weren’t perfect, but they were better than I expected them to be. And that’s when I realized that I’ve been underestimating them.”

Shortly after, the team was running the meeting without him stepping in at all. Delegation didn’t happen because Daniel suddenly “knew” he should. It happened because he behaved differently. Daniel had chosen one small, visible experiment and stuck with it long enough for this ‘new way’ to become ‘the way’.

THE TRAP OF “GOOD INTENTIONS”

For many leaders, reflection feels like progress, but without action, it isn’t enough. Sure, after a new aha moment, we can sometimes translate “knowing better” into “doing better.” But other times, awareness shakes us to the core, because we can see the gap clearly, yet have no idea how to close it.

Research from Harvard Business School (Gino & Pisano, 2014) shows that reflection paired with practice improves performance, while reflection on its own rarely shifts behaviour.

“I’ve been thinking about how I need to have that tough conversation.”
“I’ve been meaning to make more time for strategy.”
“I know I should stop filling silences in meetings.”

Thinking about it feels productive. But teams only experience behaviours, not intentions. If you intend to empower yet keep jumping in with answers, your impact is still disempowerment, no matter what you “know.”

BRIDGING THE GAP: WHAT WORKS

Here are four evidence-backed moves that help close the knowing–doing gap:

1. Tiny Experiments
Start small. Insights stick more reliably when translated into if–then plans and repeated practice. Instead of “be a better listener,” try “count to three before responding.” Instead of “do more strategy,” try “schedule 30 minutes every Friday to explore one strategic idea.”

2. Make It Visible
When people track and publicly share progress, they follow through more often. Tell someone what you’re experimenting with: your team, your coach, your peer, and invite feedback.

3. Tight Review Loops
Don’t wait a quarter to reflect. End the day with a simple check-in: Did I run the experiment? What happened? What behaviour do I need to adjust? What will I try tomorrow? Research shows short, structured reviews enhance learning and later performance.

4. Look For and Celebrate the Micro-Wins
Momentum matters. When you notice even a small improvement, pat yourself on the back. It helps you build the confidence to keep experimenting.

Leadership credibility isn’t built only on what you know. It’s built on what people see you do when it counts. So keep seeking out insights and then dare to act on them, letting those actions quietly reshape how you show up. The ripple effects will be visible in your team long before you may even notice them yourself.

Have you been sitting on an insight that hasn’t yet made its way into action? If you’re ready to close your own knowing–doing gap, you don’t have to figure it out alone. If you’re ready to explore, experiment, practice, and see real, lasting results, I’d love to be your coach. Let’s connect at www.leslierohonczy.com.

MENTOR, COACH, TEACHER, OR ADVOCATE: Choose Your Ally Wisely

My first career mentor was a petite powerhouse of a woman named Marie-Lyne. She didn’t hand me a checklist or a script. She encouraged me to get curious about my ‘wiring’, and what makes me tick. She saw my potential before I did. And she held up a mirror that changed how I saw myself and the people I was leading. That single experience transformed my leadership, and it taught me a lesson I return to often: the ally you choose doesn’t just matter; it can shape the leader you become and even change the course of your career.

I know this won’t come as a shock, but not all help is created equal. And if you’ve ever mixed up the role of a mentor with a coach, or a teacher with an advocate, you’re not alone. The lines can blur easily, so let’s get clear on who’s who in the zoo and what they do.

THE MENTOR: WISDOM ON LOAN

Mentors are the wise guides who share their lived experience. They’ve walked further down the road you’re on, and they can shine a light on what’s ahead, to help you see the potholes and boulders. The best mentors share their experiences navigating them by giving you their perspective on what worked for them, what didn’t, and what to watch out for.

Mentors can be inside your organization, offering insight into the culture, hidden rules, and landmines, or outside your company, bringing a broader industry or leadership perspective. Either way, the mentoring relationship is usually long-term and fluid, often lasting years.

Context: Let’s say you’re getting ready to deliver your first board presentation, and you’re nervous. A great mentor can tell you about when they were learning how to present in high-stakes situations, and the techniques they used to structure their presentation, and to calm their nerves.

Best moment to seek a mentor: when you’re at an inflection point in your career and need stories and context from someone who has already wrestled with the decisions you’re facing.

THE COACH: YOUR UNBIASED MIRROR

Coaching is different from mentoring in that the Coach doesn’t give you their experience or answers; they help you find your own. A qualified coach has a deep understanding of human development, and they use exploratory techniques like deep listening and powerful questions to create a safe, non-judgmental, structured space where you can unpack patterns, blind spots, and assumptions that no longer serve you, and experiment with new ways of approaching your coaching topic.

Where mentors lean on their experience, coaches focus on the process of self-exploration, awareness-building, and identifying limiting beliefs. Coaching is structured, with a well-defined topic, a clear aspirational future state, specific developmental goals, regularly scheduled sessions, and measurable outcomes. Unlike mentors or sponsors, a coach isn’t judging your performance or lobbying for your promotion. They walk alongside you, helping you bridge the gap between how you’re approaching your topic now and the vision you’re aiming for.

Context: One of my executive coaching clients explained our relationship to their leader this way: “My coach doesn’t give me advice. She gives me better questions than I was asking myself.” That’s the essence of coaching. In our board presentation example, a good coach will help you explore the limiting belief that triggers your nerves, and to develop techniques that quiet your inner critic in the moment.

Best moment to seek a coach: when you have a specific topic that you need to address, to shift not only what you’re doing but how you’re showing up.

THE TEACHER: BUILDING NEW KNOWLEDGE

When you have a knowledge gap, you need instruction. Teachers, trainers, and facilitators give you structured knowledge, practical tools, frameworks, techniques, and practice, so you can build your skills and capability.

Context: When you’re learning to deliver a board presentation, a teacher can show you the mechanics: how to structure slides, how to pace your delivery, how to manage Q&A. It’s skill-building, plain and simple.

Best moment to seek a teacher: when your gap is tactical and you need proven methods to close it quickly.

THE ADVOCATE: YOUR VOICE IN THE ROOM

Advocates, often called sponsors, open doors. They’re the senior leaders who mention your name when promotions or assignments are being discussed. They stake their reputation on your potential, and they make introductions that change the trajectory of your career.

Here’s the catch: you might not even know you HAVE a sponsor. You don’t usually choose an advocate the way you choose a mentor or coach. They choose you, based on what they’ve seen and the trust you’ve built. You can’t force it, but you can improve the odds by doing excellent work, making your contributions visible, and cultivating relationships with leaders who have influence.

Context: Your sponsor may have been tracking your progress for years, and when a board seat or a major assignment comes up, they’re the one who puts your name forward.

Best moment to seek an advocate: when you’re ready for the next level and need someone with power to clear the path.

A SIMPLE DIAGNOSTIC

Most leaders will need all four types of allies at different times in their career journeys. The mistake isn’t choosing the wrong ally once. It’s assuming one ally can fill every role forever.

So when you’re wondering “Who do I need right now?”, ask yourself:

• Do I need stories from lived experience? Mentors give hindsight.

• Do I need clarity and self-awareness? Coaches offer foresight and development.

• Do I need tactical skills? Teachers help you build skills.

• Do I need doors opened? Earn the trust of an advocate who can create access.

Marie-Lyne was the first person to show me how powerful the right ally can be. Over the years, I’ve had the privilege of learning from some wonderful mentors, coaches, teachers, and advocates. Their impact reminds me daily that the right support, offered at the right time, can transform a leader’s path.

If you’re at a crossroads and wondering what kind of support you need next, I’d be glad to have that conversation. And if it turns out that executive coaching is the ally you’re looking for, I’d love to explore how we can work together to help you move forward with confidence.