Leadership Friction

LEAVE IT WHERE IT LIES: The Leadership Habit That Creates More Friction Than Accountability

(LISTEN TO NARRATED AUDIOARTICLE VERSION)

Over almost twenty years, I've had the privilege of observing hundreds of one-on-one conversations between leaders and their employees. Some have been inspiring. Others have been uncomfortable. And some have definitely changed careers. Through all of those observations, one pattern keeps appearing, regardless of the leader's experience, industry, or personality wiring. By the time the conversation ends, only one person seems to be carrying the outcome, and surprisingly often, it's the leader.

A while ago, I was coaching a senior executive who told me he felt completely exhausted. His workload was heavy, to be sure, but not extraordinarily unmanageable; nothing had gone spectacularly wrong, and no crisis was unfolding around him. In fact, his team was capable, he described his own leader as very supportive. But he seemed to be carrying something a lot heavier than just his workload. When I asked what was weighing on him, he named one of his Directors, explained how frustrated he was with this person’s lack of accountability, and said, "I've tried everything!" As coaches, we've all learned to be curious whenever someone says they've tried everything, so we unpacked what "everything" meant.

He'd had several coaching conversations with this Director, had given him clear feedback, clarified expectations, asked thoughtful questions, and offered him support. He'd challenged when necessary and followed up on established commitments. By any reasonable standard, he was doing what good leaders do.

When he told me, "I just can't get him to take ownership", something shifted. It was such an off-handed comment that would’ve been easy to let pass. But it piqued my curiosity, so I asked him a question: "Can you actually make another adult take ownership?" He smiled almost immediately. "No." "So why are you carrying responsibility for whether he does?" He got reflective for a minute, processing this new a-ha.

It turned out he wasn't exhausted because his Director wasn't changing. He was exhausted because he'd given himself the responsibility for whether his Director changed. Those are two very different things.

I've come to believe this is one of the biggest hidden drivers of Leadership Friction. Leaders are unknowingly creating drag in their own leadership by carrying outcomes that don’t actually belong to them. And that in turn creates drag in the very systems they’re trying to streamline. Then they worry about whether feedback lands; they replay difficult conversations in the car on the way home, wondering whether someone was offended, whether the team bought into the decision, or if an employee will finally follow through this time. Every minute of attention invested there is attention unavailable for the work leaders actually own.

Most of the time, it happens for a very understandable reason: they care. In fact, I've noticed it's often the leaders who care the most who are most likely to fall into this leadership hole. They genuinely want people to succeed, and they want coaching conversations to make a difference. They want their employees to grow, and the team to thrive. Those are all signs of a leader who is deeply invested in other people.

Unfortunately, things start to go sideways when caring becomes carrying. Without realizing it, many leaders begin accepting assignments nobody ever gave them. They believe it's their responsibility to get their employee to embrace feedback, stay motivated, agree with a decision, change their behaviour, or repair a difficult relationship. Those may be the outcomes we hope for, but they're not outcomes that we can own.

There's an important distinction here that has fundamentally changed the way I think about leadership. As leaders, we are absolutely responsible for the quality of our leadership: for preparing well, communicating clearly, listening carefully, asking thoughtful questions, setting expectations, providing meaningful feedback, creating psychological safety, and removing unnecessary obstacles. We own all of that.

What we don't own is another person's decision. Once the conversation is over, another adult gets a vote. Actually, they get the only vote that matters: they decide whether they'll reflect on the feedback, and if they'll do anything with it to change their behaviour. They decide whether they'll honour the commitment they just made, and whether they'll grow. Every one of us retains the freedom to choose how we respond. As leaders, we can influence that choice, but we can't make it for someone else.

I sometimes use gardening as a metaphor for leadership. A gardener can prepare the soil, water consistently, remove weeds, and create excellent growing conditions. They can do almost everything possible to help a plant flourish. What they can't do is stand over the garden tugging on the stem because they're impatient for it to grow. Everyone understands that pulling harder doesn't accelerate growth. It damages the plant. Yet leaders often do exactly that. We explain again, send another article, schedule another follow-up, remind, rescue, and worry. Before long, we're investing more energy in another person's accountability than they are. That's not accountability. That's Leadership Friction. It's effort being invested where effort has very little ability to positively influence the result.

One of the most useful questions I ask my executive coaching clients is surprisingly simple: "What part of this actually belongs to you?" That question almost always changes the conversation because it redirects the leader's attention away from someone else's choices and back toward their own leadership. Sometimes the answer is that they haven't been clear enough. Sometimes they've avoided an uncomfortable conversation or softened feedback that needed to be direct. Occasionally, they realize they've genuinely done everything good leadership requires, and the next move belongs entirely to the other person.

That realization can feel strangely uncomfortable. Many leaders unconsciously equate carrying the outcome with caring about the person. But they're not the same thing. In fact, I've often found the opposite is true: when leaders stop rescuing people from responsibility, accountability becomes much easier to see. Employees begin carrying more of their own development because the leader has stopped carrying it for them.

That's often the moment leadership becomes more effective. The conversations become calmer, feedback becomes clearer, and the leader becomes more present because they're no longer trying to engineer the other person's reaction. They simply show up, lead well, and allow other adults to make their own adult decisions. Responsibility has finally been returned to its rightful owner.

And perhaps that's the real lesson. Leadership isn't about making other people change. It's about creating the best possible conditions for change, then respecting another person's freedom to decide what they'll do next.

That may feel like a lighter burden. In my experience, it's also a far more effective way to lead.

 

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE

I'd like to invite you to experiment with a practice I often use with executive coaching clients. I call it Leave It Where It Lies.

For the next week, pay attention to the moments when you find yourself carrying the emotional weight of another person's choices, replaying a conversation, worrying about whether someone will change, or wondering if your feedback landed.

When you notice yourself doing it, don't try to solve the problem just yet. Pause instead. Then ask yourself: "What part of this situation genuinely belongs to me as the leader?" If the answer reveals something you've been avoiding, perhaps you need to have a clearer conversation, provide more direct feedback, set stronger expectations, or create better conditions for success. That's your work. Own it fully.

Then ask yourself a second question: "What part of this belongs to someone else?" If the answer is, their motivation... their behaviour... their commitment... their response... their decision..., simply say to yourself: "That's not mine." Then make a conscious decision to leave it where it lies.

If you worry that others may think you don’t care or have lowered your expectations, simply remind yourself that another adult deserves the dignity of carrying their own responsibility.

At the end of each day, reflect on where you successfully left responsibility where it belonged, and on where you found yourself picking it up again. What did you notice about your own energy, thinking, and the quality of your leadership when you carried only what was yours?

You may discover that leadership doesn't become lighter because you care less, but because you're finally carrying the things that are truly yours.

LEADERSHIP FRICTION: How Canadian Leaders Can Take the Parking Brake Off Productivity

by Leslie Rohonczy, IMC, PCC, Executive Coach & Author

(LISTEN TO THE NARRATED AUDIOARTICLE VERSION)

What if the biggest drag on organizational performance isn't effort or access, but the way leaders unintentionally slow things down? Canada has spent years trying to solve its productivity problem. I can't help but wonder whether we're diagnosing the wrong patient.

Governments debate productivity, economists analyze it, CEOs talk about it on earnings calls, and we hear about technology, innovation, regulation, investment, artificial intelligence, and labour shortages in the media and online. Those conversations matter because according to OECD's 2025 Economic Survey, Canada's productivity has been lagging its peers for many years.

But after spending almost two decades coaching leaders inside organizations, I've become convinced there's another part of the conversation that deserves more attention: Leadership. More specifically, how small leadership behaviours that seem completely harmless on their own can slow an organization to a crawl.

Imagine driving your car with the parking brake engaged on one click. You'd probably still get where you're going, but the engine would need to work a little harder, and you'd burn a bit more fuel. You might not even notice it at first.

Now imagine clicking that parking brake up another notch; then another; and another. Eventually, you'd be pressing the accelerator harder and harder, while wondering why the car feels sluggish.

That's what I see inside many organizations. One extra approval; one more meeting that "everyone should attend"; one leader stepping in to do because it's faster than explaining; one decision climbing another level because it feels safer to have the boss review it first." None of those things feels like a crisis, but collectively, it's like driving with the parking brake on.

Leaders who create the most friction are often the hardest-working people in the organization. They're dedicated, they care deeply, they're incredibly capable... and they're also exhausted. I've lost count of the number of leaders who've told me, "I'm involved in everything," with a touch of pride. When they offer this up as evidence of their commitment, I see it as a warning light on their leadership dashboard.

One senior executive I coached was frustrated that every important decision landed on her desk. She genuinely believed her leaders lacked confidence. I spent several weeks observing her leadership team meetings and one-on-one meetings. Whenever a difficult question surfaced, all eyes turned toward her. Experience had taught them that if they waited a few more seconds, the answers would arrive. From her perspective, she was simply being helpful. But before anyone else had a chance to wrestle with the issue (and learn from the experience), she'd offered a suggestion, answered the question, or made the decision herself.

As a leader, when you're capable, experienced, and genuinely committed to helping your people succeed, stepping in feels responsible, and the truth is that sometimes it is. But the challenge comes when that strong desire to help turns into over-functioning.

One of the practices I use to coach leaders is called 'Leave It Where It Lies'. It's super simple, and a great practice to experiment with. If someone else owns the work, the decision, or the problem, leave the ownership with them. Coach them, support them, challenge their thinking, and ask powerful questions designed to create greater awareness. Just don't slip the backpack onto your own shoulders because you think you can carry it more easily.

Unnecessary approvals send a message. Jumping in to rescue teaches a lesson, and decisions you reclaim make the next one more likely to find its way back to your desk. None of that shows up on your productivity dashboard, but it definitely slows the entire organization down, one click of the parking brake at a time.

What if, instead of focusing on becoming more personally productive, we focused on removing friction for everyone around us instead? Ask: "Where have I become a bottleneck? What am I holding that someone else is ready to carry? What would happen if I resisted the urge to help for just sixty more seconds?"

 

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE

Over the next week, become a student of your own leadership friction. Don't try to change anything at first. Just notice the moments when you feel the urge to step in, approve something, answer a question, solve a problem, rescue someone who's struggling, or join a meeting because you're worried they might need you.

When you notice the impulse, pause and ask yourself:

  • Does this really belong to me? If not, who does it belong to?

  • What might happen if I leave ownership with the owner?

  • How might I build capability, instead of dependency?

Then make a conscious choice. You may still decide to step in, and sometimes that's exactly what good leadership requires. The goal isn't to become less helpful. It's to become more intentional about when your help creates momentum, and when it just adds another click to the parking brake.

Canada's productivity challenge is real, and solving it will require action from everyone: governments, educators, investors, innovators, and business leaders alike. And inside our own organizations, every one of us can start making a contribution tomorrow morning.

Remember that the parking brake doesn't come off all at once; it comes off one click at a time. What if that's how organizations can become more productive, too?

 If you’d like to explore leadership productivity in your organization, reach out for a free exploratory executive coaching conversation at www.leslierohonczy.com.

YOU’VE MADE YOURSELF THE SYSTEM: The Ego Payoff of Control

By Leslie Rohonczy, IMC™, PCC

Executive Coach | Leadership Development Expert | Author | Speaker | ©2026 | www.leslierohonczy.com

(LISTEN TO THE NARRATED VERSION)

 Leaders, have you ever had that moment where you pause, look around, and realize, “It’s all on me”…? You’re involved in everything, every decision, every escalation, every aspect of the work from strategy to execution. You send late-night messages that start with “Hey, quick question...” You carry the weight, you solve the problems, and you keep the whole machine running.

But if you listen closely, underneath what can start to feel like a kind of performative martyrdom, you might notice a sense of pride in being the one who holds it all together; the one who’s central, necessary, irreplaceable.

We don’t typically acknowledge this uncomfortable fact; hell, we’re often not even aware that it’s what’s driving us. Others might look at us and think, “Wow, that’s commitment.” But from the inside, it’s something deeper. Think about it: if it’s truly all on you, then either the system is broken, or you’ve made yourself the system.

 

IT FEELS LIKE LEADERSHIP, BUT...

So many of the leaders I coach tell me they haven’t been able to get away for a real break. There’s always something too important, too fragile, or too dependent on them.

The one that really stays with me was a woman who hadn’t taken a proper vacation in nine years. Her team leaned on her constantly, she was the implicit leader of her peer group, and her actual leader repeatedly rewarded her for being “indispensable.”

Nine years without a real break. In one session, after walking through yet another week of being pulled into everything, I asked her: "What do you get out of being needed like this?" She paused for a long time before answering, then she said, “I know that I matter.” Oof! Right in the feels!

It took real courage to say it out loud, to see how something in her was driving her behaviour, and even her identity.

 

THE SECRET PAYOFF

When you've set up the system so that everything must run through you, you receive constant reinforcement as the one who people turn to, the one who knows what’s going on, and the one who can fix things when they break. That creates a powerful internal reward that goes far beyond external validation.

Behavioural psychology says that we repeat behaviours that are rewarded, especially when the reward is tied to how we see ourselves. The feeling of being relevant, necessary, and relied upon isn’t trivial. It anchors identity.

So when a leader says "I need to delegate more", but then doesn’t follow through, I don’t assume it's a skill gap. I get curious, and invite them to get curious along with me, about the payoff they haven’t named yet. More often than not, that payoff is about keeping them at the center of a system that needs them to function, and reinforcing the belief that they need to stay at the center to remain relevant. It’s as if they believe they won't matter if they’re not involved in every decision and every thread, which helps to explain why letting go feels risky and why control feels so important to them.

 

CONTROL DISGUISED AS COMMITMENT

Now that we're digging deep, here’s another layer that’s even harder to see: carrying everything is about control. If work runs through you, you can see it, shape it, and intervene before it goes sideways. That reduces uncertainty, which matters more than most of us are willing to admit.

And the pattern reinforces and amplifies itself over time. You stay involved to reduce risk, your team stays dependent because you’re involved, and you feel even more responsible because they depend on you. Eventually, this stops being a leadership approach and becomes a closed system in the exact shape of you, with everything designed to run through you.

 

THE EGO TRAP

There’s a sharper edge to this that’s worth naming. Believing that it’s all up to you can carry a subtle (sometimes not-so-subtle) form of ego-centricity. It’s not just that you believe it, it’s that you’ve positioned yourself as the center through which everything has to move. Maybe it wasn’t intentional, and it may not look like arrogance in the obvious sense, but there’s a deeply held belief that things won’t function without you at the center.

It sounds responsible and committed, but when leaders place themselves at the center of every outcome, and hold that belief, even unconsciously, it will crowd out the capability of others. There’s little room for different approaches or shared ownership. Over time, it sends a message to the team that says, “I’ve got this...,” which people eventually hear as, “...and that's because I think you don’t.” It's not your intention, of course, but that's the impact nonetheless.

One of the reasons this pattern is so hard to shift is because it’s tied to how leaders see their relevance, their role, their value, and their responsibility.

 

STAND DOWN, HERO

Many leaders built their careers on being the person who steps in and saves the day, because they see problems faster than others, connect the dots, and move things forward. That ability is often rewarded early and often. Then they get promoted, and the rules change.

At more senior levels, the role is no longer to be the hero. The role is to build a team that doesn’t need one. And that shift is far more difficult than it sounds, because it requires us to let things wobble, to watch others struggle, and to resist stepping in when we can clearly see the answer.

For a leader whose identity is built on being capable and reliable, that can feel like negligence rather than growth. So they keep stepping in, and over time, they find themselves carrying more than they can sustain.

 

HIDDEN COSTS

This pattern doesn’t just lead to burnout. When everything runs through you, your team stops thinking at the same level. It doesn't just feel like everything runs through you; it actually does. Decisions bottleneck, ownership becomes unclear, and frustration builds. You begin to feel like you’re carrying people, while they begin to feel that they aren’t trusted.

There’s also a structural limit that shows up over time. As your role becomes more complex, your capacity won’t scale if you stay the central hub for everything. You don’t just feel like a bottleneck, you become one, even though your intention is to support the system. Here's a marker for a high-performing leader: they can step away for a good stretch (say the length of a proper vacation), and the team still functions well and achieves their objectives. If performance drops because decisions stall or everything waits for you, you know the system is built around you. And at senior levels, that doesn’t just create strain, it caps your career trajectory, because leaders who can’t step out without things slowing down or collapsing are difficult to move up.

Some leaders don’t fully want to let go of this pattern because it serves something important: it reinforces identity, creates a sense of value, and offers a level of control that feels stabilizing.

If that pattern were to change, a different question would emerge: If you’re not the one holding everything together, then who are you as a leader?

 

SHIFTING THE ROLE

Leaders who move through this don’t suddenly disengage. They become more deliberate about where they show up and why. The work isn’t just to take things off their plate; it’s to redesign the system so it doesn’t rely on them in the same way.

And a powerful upside: when you step back in the right places, your people step forward. They make decisions, test ideas, and start to question “the way we do it here” instead of waiting for your answer or permission. That’s where capability actually grows, not in perfectly executed instructions, but in imperfect attempts they own. If everything continues to run through you, your team adapts by bringing problems, not proposals, and waiting to be told rather than thinking it through. When you shift your role, you change that pattern and create space for judgment and challenge, and for different ways of doing things to emerge.

They begin to ask themselves more precise questions like, "What truly requires my involvement?" "Where am I stepping in out of habit rather than necessity?" "What am I preventing my team from learning?"

They also develop something that doesn’t get talked about enough in leadership development: tolerance. Tolerance for ambiguity, for imperfect execution, and for outcomes that don’t match exactly how they would have done it. Tolerance (what some might call grace) is what allows leadership to scale beyond the limits of one person.

 

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE

Take a clear look at your current load, not just what you’re carrying, but how it got there. Approach this as an intentional practice, not a quick reflection.

STEP 1: MAP YOUR CURRENT LOAD Write down the key decisions, problems, and responsibilities that regularly flow through you.

STEP 2: IDENTIFY THE PATTERN For each item, ask yourself: Where does this genuinely require my involvement? Where am I stepping in because it feels uncomfortable not to? What do I get, emotionally, from being the one who carries this?

STEP 3: NAME THE PAYOFF Be honest here. What does being needed give you? Relevance, control, certainty, recognition? If you don’t name it, you can’t shift it.

STEP 4: EXPERIMENT WITH PULLING BACK Choose one or two areas where you can intentionally step back by about ten percent. Be specific about what you will stop doing, delay, or redirect.

STEP 5: BUILD TOLERANCE As you step back, notice what shows up. Discomfort, anxiety, the urge to jump back in. Don’t fix it immediately. Stay with it. This is where the real work is.

STEP 6: OBSERVE THE SYSTEM Watch what happens when you’re not in the middle. Do others step forward? Do things wobble? Do new ideas emerge? This is data, not a verdict.

The goal of this practice isn’t perfection. It’s awareness and experimentation. What you notice here will tell you more about your leadership than any framework ever will.

And if you want to make some leadership shifts in a practical, grounded way, reach out for a free exploratory Executive Coaching conversation at www.leslierohonczy.com.

WHEN LEADERS CARRY TOO MUCH: Why Decisions Keep Landing with You

(LISTEN TO THE NARRATED AUDIOARTICLE VERSION)

Have you ever noticed that moment after you step out of a meeting, when progress seems to pause until you return? Decisions wait, conversations stall, and capable people hesitate. That’s often the first flicker of awareness that decision-making has reorganized itself around you.

I’ve lived this pattern, and I think we’ve all experienced it in some way in our lives. I see it repeatedly in the leaders I coach, too. These are not weak or inexperienced leaders; they are trusted, competent, and deeply conscientious. But how does this pattern form in the first place?

It's typically not through a single misstep, but through a series of small, reasonable choices that accumulate over time: that extra check-in; the decision you tidy up; one risk you absorb so no one else has to; that moment where stepping in feels safer than stepping back. It becomes “the way we do the work,” and over time, that solidifies into your team’s unspoken operating system.

No one sets out with the intention to disempower anyone, or to become an indispensable bottleneck. Yet many leaders become the place where everyone’s fear comes to rest. This isn’t a delegation failure. It’s a signal that fear is moving through your system, and you’ve become the reliable container for it.

 

The Story We Don’t Realize We’re Telling

Years ago, I worked with a senior leader who prided herself on being the calm port in the storm. In meetings, she leaned forward, listened closely, and asked sharp questions. When something felt unresolved, she stepped in, often with a sentence that began, “Why don’t we just…”

Her team adored her, and they brought her everything, not because they were incapable, but because over time, they’d learned that clarity would certainly come from her if they waited. She would synthesize, decide, and make it feel safer to wait for her input. They weren’t avoiding responsibility; they were responding to a well-worn pattern.

She came to our first executive coaching meeting frustrated. “I know I’m not supposed to own all of this,” she said, “and yet, when I don’t step in, I feel like I'm being negligent.” 

That word matters more than it first appears.

 

When Identity Overrides Role

Most leaders understand their role intellectually. They can describe it clearly and can point to job descriptions, mandates, and governance structures. But what often runs the show isn’t found in these leadership toolkits, structures, models, and frameworks that are meant to distribute responsibility. What does run the show? Identity. Or more specifically, a certain limiting belief about what leadership is. 

For example, if somewhere along the way you learned that being seen as valuable meant being the helpful person who steps in early, or the one who sees risks before others do, then this pattern makes sense. Some might call it jumping to solution, people-pleasing, over-functioning, or carrying the emotional and decision-making load for others. But whatever label you use, it isn’t a flaw; it’s a protective strategy that once worked beautifully for you. And now that the game has changed, along with the leadership context, this strategy has become a liability.

High-performance leadership asks for something different. It asks you to tolerate the unresolved space; to let others struggle a little and learn along the way, while you try your best to remain present without absorbing or overriding.

To be clear, this isn’t a delegation issue; it’s an identity negotiation. When fear pulls decisions upward, authority and accountability drift out of alignment. Decision-making isn't happening at the right level, so leaders end up holding calls that should sit closer to the work, robbing their employees of the chance to build judgment, confidence, and accountability muscles.

 

The Signals We Send

Our teams are highly perceptive. They interpret posture, tone, pacing, non-verbals, and micro-expressions, and react to the unspoken trans-contextual information that lives between the cold, hard facts. Then they use it to make sense of their own roles and objectives.

When you lean in too fast, finish sentences, rescue awkward pauses, or offer solutions before the problem has been fully unfolded, you aren’t being inefficient. From your point of view, you may feel that you’re being generous. But this kind of generosity, left unexamined, does more than shape behaviour; it erodes confidence. Over time, people begin to doubt their own judgment, second-guess their instincts, or disengage altogether. Individual initiative gives way to collective caution, and responsibility is deferred upward, not because people don’t care, but because they can no longer trust themselves to get it right.

Over time, the message received is unmistakable: "Bring it to me. I’ve got this."

 

When Competence Creates Dependence

No one becomes a bottleneck intentionally. You deliver under pressure, respond quickly, and steady things when they wobble. Each time you do, your organization learns something important about you; not just that you are capable, but that they can safely hand things off to you. Over time, decisions, risks, and unresolved issues begin to gravitate in your direction. Eventually, more and more gets routed to you, not because others can't carry it, but because you have consistently shown that you will. What began as reliability slowly turns into dependence.

The cost is not only the additional workload that should be done by those under you. It's also relational. When leaders hold too much, teams stay smaller than they need to be, confidence weakens, initiative dulls, and people look upward rather than outward or inward.

This is not really about being dependable, having a good work ethic, or wanting to be in control for its own sake; those are downstream effects. At its core, the pattern is driven by the need to regulate fear and identity, which is why it persists, even in highly capable teams. 

Here are the typical drivers I see in the leaders I coach. It's common for a few to overlap, and you may recognise more than one in play for you:

  1. Self-soothing through intervention
    Jumping in reduces uncertainty and can help settle the nervous system. You feel calmer once you’ve checked, clarified, or corrected. That relief is real and immediate, which makes the behaviour sticky.

  2. Fear-based verification
    “I’ll just take a look.” “Let me sanity-check that.” “I want to make sure this won’t blow back on us.” This is less about mistrust of others and more about mistrust of outcomes in a system where consequences feel personal.

  3. Identity reinforcement
    Stepping in confirms a deeply held belief that you add value by being sharp, early, and right. Not stepping in can feel like abdication of responsibility, unnecessary exposure, or even downright negligence.

  4. Contextual threat amplification
    In many organisations, risk is personalised. Bonuses, reputations, and roles feel precarious, so leaders absorb responsibility because the system rewards those who do. Over time, the costs show up clearly in slower decisions, thinner benches, and leaders who can’t step away without work stalling.

 

A Different Way to Hold Your Leadership Role

The shift isn’t about doing less, it’s about holding your role differently. It starts with noticing the moment just before you step in: the breath you take; the urge to tidy things up; the familiar sense that it would be easier if you just handled it yourself.

That moment is where the work actually lives. Stay with it. Letting the room feel unfinished. Ask a question instead of offering an answer. Sit back in your chair, literally and metaphorically. This is leadership presence, not leadership absence, even if it may feel counterintuitive at first.

Your Coaching Challenge

For the next five working days, treat this as an observation practice, not a behaviour change exercise. Each day, deliberately observe yourself in action as you move through your workday. Watch for one moment where work, decisions, or emotional weight start to move toward you by default. When it happens, slow the moment down and make note of the following:

  • What specifically is being handed to me right now, a decision, a risk, reassurance, or responsibility?

  • What belief or fear gets activated in me that makes stepping in feel necessary or safer?

  • What signal might I be sending, intentionally or not, that draws this toward me?

  • What is the smallest possible way I could stay present here without absorbing or resolving this for them?

  • Where does this decision or judgment properly belong in the system, and what would help it exist at a lower level, instead of with me?

Do not intervene or do anything differently yet; just notice. The goal is to build your awareness about how fear, identity, and habit shape your leadership posture in real time.

At the end of the week, reflect on this question: Where have I been acting as the container for other people’s uncertainty, and what is that costing my team, and me?

You are not being asked to let go of care or standards. You are being invited to decide more consciously what is truly yours to carry.

If this pattern feels familiar and you’re curious about how to shift it without losing your sense of care and accountability, reach out for a free exploratory Executive Coaching conversation at www.leslierohonczy.com.

THE GREAT MEETING REBELLION: Breaking Free from Calendar Captivity

If your calendar feels like it belongs to everyone but you, you are not alone. Most of us are trapped in ‘calendar captivity’: meeting after meeting, hour after hour, leaving no oxygen for strategy, reflection, spontaneous co-creation with others, or leadership development. But take heart; cracks are forming in this culture of calendar worship, and the great meeting rebellion has begun!

 

AN EVERYDAY OBSERVATION

I was recently standing in line at Bridgehead waiting for my tea, when I overheard two men comparing notes about who had more meetings that week. Clearly, it was a competition! They were bragging about whose calendar was more dense, as if a suffocating schedule and meeting fatigue were badges of honour, or the way to prove their value and importance. What a crock. Ever wonder how we got to the point that our working culture has normalised busyness as a way to demonstrate our significance or importance, even when it adds no value? Let’s look at the data.

 

THE DATA BEHIND IT

  • Microsoft’s Work Trend Index shows meeting time has tripled since 2020.

  • Harvard Business School found that 71% of managers consider meetings inefficient.

  • And a global survey of knowledge workers by Atlassian, the Australian software company behind Jira, Confluence, and Trello, found that employees lose about 31 hours per month to unproductive meetings and communication.

 

THE NEUROSCIENCE OF MEETING OVERLOAD

Neuroscience also helps explain why endless meetings feel so exhausting. Our brains are not designed to shift focus dozens of times a day, nor to make decisions without breaks or downtime. When calendars are packed with back-to-back meetings, there are several predictable effects that can show up in our brains:

  • Decision fatigue: Each meeting requires choices, and the prefrontal cortex tires quickly. Later in the day, people tend to make more default or shallow decisions. Leadership experts such as Dr. David Rock of the NeuroLeadership Institute recommend scheduling your most important decisions for the morning, when mental energy is highest.

  • Directed attention fatigue: Constantly forcing focus drains the part of the brain that helps us manage attention and regulate emotions. When it is overtaxed, our ability to listen generously and respond thoughtfully decreases, which is why people become more irritable, less empathetic, and quicker to snap during back-to-back meetings.

  • Default mode network: This brain network switches on when we are not focused on a specific task, such as when daydreaming, walking, showering, running, or letting our minds wander. It is critical for creativity, reflection, and for connecting disparate ideas. When calendars are overpacked, the default mode network doesn’t have the chance to activate, which means we lose the mental space where many of our best insights would normally emerge.

 

PUBLIC EXAMPLES OF PUSHBACK

Shopify made headlines in 2023 by introducing a ‘calendar purge’ in early 2023, cancelling many recurring meetings with more than two people, enforcing a meeting-free day (Wednesdays), and limiting large gatherings. I don’t know if that policy is still in place (perhaps someone from Spotify can chime in below), but at the time, the changes yielded a measurable drop in meeting overload, and it got people talking about meeting necessity.

Deloitte Canada’s hybrid work-research shows employees increasingly value flexibility and well-being, and many describe strain from coordination overload and excessive meetings. Leaders are responding with bold resets: no-meeting days, mandatory agendas, decision-only rules.

 

WHAT THE REBELLION LOOKS LIKE

Leaders who have begun to push back against calendar overload are not doing it with small tweaks. They are redesigning how time is used, putting in place clear rules and experiments that challenge the default culture of ‘meetings first.’ The rebellion is not about eliminating every meeting; rather, it’s about treating each one as a costly investment of attention that must earn its place on the calendar.

Here are some of the strategies that are gaining traction:

YOUR COACHING CHALLENGE

Reclaim the Calendar

Doing:
For the next two weeks, conduct a personal calendar audit. Label every meeting as one of three types:

  • A = Action (a decision or choice needs to be made)

  • C = Check-in (information-only updates needed)

  • T = Transfer (asynchronous: share documents, Slack, or AI-generated notes).

Cancel or reframe at least one meeting in each category. For example, shift an information meeting into a written update, or shorten a decision meeting by clarifying the decision before it begins.

 

What to Notice:

  • When a meeting is labelled as Action, did it truly lead to a clear decision or next step?

  • For Check-in meetings, did the conversation actually create alignment, or could the same update have been delivered another way?

  • For Transfer items, what happened when I moved them out of the calendar and into a written or asynchronous channel?

  • How did my focus, energy, or availability shift as I applied the ACT filter across my schedule?

 

Reflection Questions:

  1. Which meetings truly belonged in the Action category, and which ones slipped in without a real decision attached?

  2. How much value did my Check-in meetings add, and where did I see opportunities to streamline or shorten them?

  3. What did I learn about the effectiveness of moving Transfer items into asynchronous channels?

  4. How did applying ACT change my sense of control over my calendar?

  5. If I made ACT a habit across my team, how might it shift the culture of meetings in my organisation?

 The most radical leadership act of 2025 may be refusing to waste your professional life in bad meetings.

 

Reach out for a free exploratory Executive Coaching conversation at www.leslierohonczy.com.

"I'M SO BUSY!" How Our Busyness Attachment Kills Trust & Impact

Leslie Rohonczy, IMC™, PCC, Executive Coach, Leadership Expert, Speaker, Author

“I’m just so busy.” We say it, hear it, and even wear it like a badge. But somewhere along the way, busy stopped being impressive – and started becoming a liability.

It’s time to challenge one of leadership’s most quietly damaging blind spots: the cult of busyness.

For years, “busy” has been shorthand for “important.” It signals hustle, responsibility, leadership weight. But there’s an uncomfortable truth beneath this 4-letter word: when busy becomes your default, your credibility takes the hit. Your team gets your leftovers. Strategy disappears. And trust is the first casualty.

Believe me, this is NOT a productivity article. Think of it more like a leadership reckoning. One that calls on high-performing, high-capacity professionals to stop hiding behind full calendars, and start showing up with full presence.

WHEN BUSY ISN’T BRAVE – IT’S BLIND

Many of the senior leaders I coach are smart, committed, and wildly capable. But they’re also often stuck, drowning in meetings, firefighting and problem-solving all day long, running from one obligation to the next with barely a breath in between. And when we dig into the research about this, something strange emerges: they often can’t remember what strategic work they actually did that week.

They’re not failing because they’re lazy. They’re failing because they’re too busy to lead. Here’s what that kind of busyness costs you:

  • Trust erosion: When your team sees you rushing, cancelling, or distracted, they stop bringing you their best. They assume you don’t have time for real conversation.

  • Tactical tunnel vision: Your attention is spent reacting, not shaping. Urgent wins. Important waits.

  • Missed influence moments: Strategic presence isn’t just about being in the room. It’s about how you show up. If your energy is thin and transactional, so is your impact.

  • Credibility creep: Leaders who are constantly busy but rarely available get labelled as unreliable, scattered, or avoidant – even if their intentions are solid.

The busyness bias tells you that filling your calendar is the same as fulfilling your role. It’s not.

A TIME ISSUE – OR A TRUTH ISSUE?

Let’s get clear: busyness isn’t always about workload or external pressure. More often, it’s an emotional decoy – a polished distraction that protects us from something deeper and more uncomfortable.

In coaching sessions, when I ask leaders what might be underneath their relentless pace, I often hear a pause. Then something raw emerges:

  • "If I’m not busy, am I still valuable?"

  • "If I slow down, will everything fall apart?"

  • "If I delegate, will people realise I’m not as indispensable as they think?"

Busyness can serve as armour. It shields us from vulnerability. It lets us avoid the hard work of confronting our worth, our fear of irrelevance, or our struggle with control. But here’s the truth: filling your calendar won’t fill the gap left by uncertainty, self-doubt, or the need for external validation.

This isn’t a time management issue. It’s a mindset and meaning issue. And until we start asking better questions about what our busyness is really doing for us, we can’t lead with full presence.

So let me ask you the real question: What is your busyness protecting you from?

  • “If I’m not busy, am I still valuable?”

  • “If I slow down, will everything fall apart?”

  • “If I delegate, will they realise they don’t need me?”

These are mindset issues, not time issues. And they’re incredibly common. We don’t just have a time management problem. We have a permission problem.

Permission to focus.

Permission to say no.

Permission to stop doing and start leading.

THE LEADERSHIP COST OF BUSY CULTURE

High-output cultures often reward busyness, but rarely examine its downstream impact.

Ask yourself:

  • Do I equate visibility with value?

  • Am I filling space or creating value?

  • Do my actions signal strategic focus – or survival mode?

Because here’s what’s really happening in most “too busy” leaders:

They’re reactive, not responsive. They move fast but think shallow. And over time, they erode the trust, creativity, and collaboration that leadership depends on.

SO, WHAT’S THE ALTERNATIVE?

What does it look like to unhook from busy – and step into something more powerful?

It looks like this:

  • A leader who blocks white space in their week to think, not just react.

  • A VP who finishes meetings early to give people breathing room.

  • An executive who says no with clarity, because strategy is about choosing.

And it sounds like this:

“Let’s revisit what matters most this quarter.”

“If I step back here, what does the team step into?”

“Where is my presence needed – not just my time?”

This isn’t about working less. It’s about leading more intentionally.

THREE PRACTICES TO BREAK THE BUSY BIAS

You don’t need a sabbatical. You need a reset. Here’s where to begin:

1. Audit Your Leadership Calendar

For one week, track your time. Label it: Operational? Relational? Strategic? Then ask yourself: What am I doing out of habit or fear? What am I avoiding? What am I missing? If your calendar doesn’t reflect your priorities, it’s time to renegotiate.

2. Notice the Story Underneath

Ask yourself: What am I afraid would happen if I weren’t so busy? What belief is driving your behaviour? Often, it’s about worth, fear of irrelevance, or discomfort with delegation. Awareness is the first step to choosing differently.

3. Create a Weekly White Space Ritual

Block 90 minutes each week to step out of the churn. No meetings. No messages. Just think, reflect, recalibrate. Ask: What does the organization need from me this week? What does my team need from me? Who haven’t I been fully present with?

BUSY ISN’T A BADGE. IT’S A BARRIER.

Let’s stop rewarding chronic overload like it’s leadership gold. Busyness isn’t your brand. Presence is. Trust doesn’t grow in chaos. Strategy doesn’t emerge from noise. And your influence doesn’t deepen when you’re double-booked and distracted. So the next time you’re tempted to lead with “I’m so busy,” try this instead:

“I’m focused on what matters most.”

“I have the space to think about that properly.”

“I’ve made time for this conversation because it’s important.”

Now that’s leadership impact.

Ready to Reclaim Your Strategic Presence?

If you’re ready to break free from busy and build a leadership brand based on clarity, trust, and presence – let’s talk. Executive coaching can help you rewire your leadership approach, redefine how you spend your time, and refocus your energy on what creates real impact.

Schedule a complimentary discovery session at www.leslierohonczy.com. Let’s stop being busy – and start being bold.

LEADERSHIP BOUNDARIES: How Setting Them Helps You Lead Better

Leslie Rohonczy, IMC™, PCC, Executive Coach, Leadership Expert, Speaker, Author

 

If you had to write your current leadership job description, would it look more like a recipe for burnout? Deliver outstanding results. Develop every employee. Wow the board. Oh, and by the way, still have a personal life. No wonder so many leaders are overwhelmed. But real leadership isn't about doing more. It's about protecting the space to think, connect, and guide others wisely, and that starts with the boundaries you set… and keep.

I know... easier said than done. Let's dive in.

 

THE INVISIBLE BURDEN OF LEADERSHIP

If you’re a senior leader trying to do it all, you’re not alone. Many of my coaching clients describe their days as a blur of meetings, decisions, endless MSTeams conversations, strategy pivots, performance conversations, and late night emails before bed. They want to lead well, delegate decisions, grow their people, and focus on strategy. But the gravitational pull of "just getting it done" can be relentless.

I'm currently working with a senior leader who came to our coaching program showing classic signs of executive burnout: chronic sleep disruption, decision fatigue from being the go-to for every issue, and the heavy emotional load of being both the informal mentor and the motivational poster boy for the entire executive team. He was expected to guide his peers, champion innovation, and stay relentlessly positive for his employees. It wasn’t sustainable. And it wasn’t healthy and effective leadership, either.

When we explored his patterns, it became clear: he had no boundaries. We spent the next several sessions talking about how important it is for leaders to develop this skill, and how boundaries don’t restrict leadership; they enable it.

 

WHY LEADERS NEED BOUNDARIES

A healthy boundary isn’t a wall. It’s more like a fence with a gate; it lets you decide what you let in and what you keep out.

Without boundaries, your calendar fills with other people’s priorities. Your mind starts tuning into problems that don’t belong to you, like a radio stuck on someone else’s station. Before long, your leadership becomes reactive instead of strategic.

And neuroscience tells us that when your cognitive load is maxed out, your ability to think strategically and regulate your emotions drops like a stone. Without boundaries, even the most well-intentioned leaders lose their edge.

 

WHEN BOUNDARIES MATTER MOST

Lack of leadership boundaries are often visible to the naked eye (and to your colleagues) and show up in more ways than we realise. In fact, they often hide in plain sight, and can show up as:

  • Chronic overcommitment and unrealistic workloads

  • Micromanaging or difficulty delegating

  • People-pleasing and conflict avoidance

  • Constant urgency and inability to prioritise

  • Blurry role expectations or lack of clarity about who the decision-maker is

  • Emotional over-responsibility for others' stress or performance

These behaviours are clear signals that leadership boundaries have broken down. By naming the most common categories where boundaries fail, we can start to make clearer, more deliberate choices about what to reinforce, what to release, and what to reframe.

1. Decision-Making Boundaries: Not every decision should land on your desk. Get clear on what decisions belong to you, and what belongs at other levels. If your team is coming to you with every minor decision, you haven’t delegated – you’ve just distributed tasks.

2. Time and Attention Boundaries
Strategic thinking needs white space. Block it. Guard it. And stop glorifying back-to-back days as evidence of effectiveness. The best leaders protect time to think, reflect, and prepare.

3. Emotional Boundaries
Empathy is essential. But caring doesn’t mean carrying. Leaders who absorb everyone's stress eventually become the stressor. Learn to support without overidentifying.

4. Role Boundaries
Are you leading the work, or doing the work? The higher you go, the more your value lies in thinking, direction-setting, and people leadership. If you're still the fixer, you're limiting your team's growth and your own impact.

 

WHY SETTING BOUNDARIES FEELS SO HARD

While we're at it, let’s name the elephant: what often makes boundary-setting hard is the corporate culture itself. Many leaders work within management systems that reward over-functioning. Inside an over-achieving culture, people often wear their workaholism as a badge of honour ("Look at me! I'm SO busy!").

And as if that wasn't enough, leaders don’t just have to wrestle with their own beliefs about boundaries – they also face pushback from above. The boss who frowns at you for blocking thinking time in your calendar. The praise lavished onto the ones who work late or respond instantly; always 'on'. This creates a culture of conformity, where boundary-setting feels like rebellion or even dereliction of duty. 

When leaders are so steeped in this culture that they feel there's no choice but to grind themselves into the ground, what should they do?

  • Frame boundaries in terms of business impact. (“I block two hours a week to think deeply about our strategy. It helps me bring sharper insight to our executive meetings.”)

  • Find allies who are also hungry for a healthier way to lead, and have leadership culture conversations with each other. A rising tide lifts all boats.

  • Get curious about the nature of this culture you’re part of, and what's driving it. What stories are being told about what leadership should look like? Who benefits from that story staying in place?

Remember: your organisation may not change overnight, but your choice of boundaries can influence the system more than you think. Boundaries sound simple, but our resistance is real, because many leaders have limiting beliefs about setting them; that saying no means you're not a team player; that availability equals leadership; and that if they don’t do it, it won’t get done right.

These beliefs aren’t loyalty, and they are certainly not serving you or your organization. They’re over-functioning habits dressed up as commitment. And they cost us trust, team development, innovation, and time we’ll never get back.

 

THREE STRATEGIES TO BUILD STRONGER LEADERSHIP BOUNDARIES

If you're ready to experiment with boundaries but aren’t sure where to begin, here are three practical starting points.

1. Frame Boundaries as a Leadership Service
The next time you’re tempted to jump in and solve a problem, ask yourself: Am I helping them grow? Or am I rescuing them because it's faster? Boundaries create space for others to learn, decide, and lead.

2. Practice Micro-Scripts for Protecting Boundaries
Have a few simple phrases at the ready, to pull out when you need them:

  • “That decision belongs with you. What are you leaning toward?”

  • “I’m booked right now. Can we talk tomorrow when I can give you my full attention?”

  • “Let’s clarify where this decision lives on our team.”

  • "My capacity is full at the moment, but I can take that on next month."

Boundaries don’t have to be dramatic. They just need to be consistent.

3. Create a Boundary Map
Try this exercise:

  • List your current commitments.

  • Label them: Keep, Delegate, or Revisit.

  • Then ask: What boundary would protect and ensure my best contribution?

Small boundary shifts create big ripple effects. 

If you want to dig deeper, you can check out the resources in my previous articles. Each offers additional practices and insights that complement this one:

 

HERE'S YOUR INVITATION

Boundaries aren’t just a self-care practice. They’re a discipline of high-performing leadership. Your boundaries model what’s healthy for your team. And your organisation. (And yes, for your family, too.) Boundaries don't make you less available, they make you more impactful. 

So here's your invitation: define your role not by what you can handle, but by what only you should handle. Think of your leadership boundaries not as 'selfish', but as the highest form of respect: for your team, your mission, and yourself.

Want to explore how setting healthy leadership boundaries could transform your leadership impact? I offer a free discovery conversation to help you explore how executive coaching can strengthen your boundaries, resilience, and strategic leadership. Let's connect.

BREAKING BUSY: Toxic Productivity and the Dark Side of Hustle Culture

by Leslie Rohonczy, Executive Coach, IMC, PCC | ©2024 | www.leslierohonczy.com

 In a world that glorifies hustle, many of us have fallen into the toxic productivity trap: the relentless drive to be constantly busy and accomplished, often at the expense of our well-being. This obsessive pursuit of success can become a destructive cycle, leaving us feeling guilty when we're not working, dissatisfied and exhausted when we are.

But what if there was a way to break free from the chains of toxic productivity? What if we could redefine success in a way that allowed us to mindfully embrace downtime, set boundaries, allow support, and hold ourselves with compassion?

 

The Productivity Pressure

For many, the pressure to be productive is a constant companion. It urges us on, driven by societal expectations, cultural norms, and the pervasive influence of social media that features perfect, shiny people in states of perpetual productivity. The underlying message is clear: to be valuable, we must be busy, accomplished, and continuously achieving.

I’ve wrestled with toxic productivity for most of my life. I remember always feeling ‘antsy’ in stillness and rarely let myself become truly bored. If boredom somehow snuck through my defense shields, I would twitch and whinge for awhile, and then try to find ways to self-sooth, usually through creative ideation (aka having a party in my head) just so that I would feel productive in some way. Of course, that’s been beneficial in some ways: for channeling creativity, innovation, and problem-solving, for example. But this kind of productivity also has a dark side: it’s been a relentless taskmaster that leaves no room for stillness; only a subtle (and sometimes not so subtle) gnawing feeling of guilt tied to the perception of laziness, or an anxious feeling that I’ve wasted precious time that could have been used more productively. And when I haven’t kept it in check, this constant drive has led to stress, overwhelm, and a sense of not being ‘enough’, no matter how much I achieved.

Even now, people frequently comment on my busyness and level of output. There’s no denying that a part of me that finds it energizing to list the ‘productive’ activities I love so much: executive coaching, team and leadership development sessions, mentoring coaches, making Coaching Minute videos, songwriting, recording and producing original music, rehearsals and live performances, teaching music, writing articles like this one, book events, painting and making jewellery. FUN!! And yet… there’s also considerable discomfort when I read it all in one sentence, because it reveals how deeply I’ve internalized the need to be constantly producing. The concept of 'rest' becomes intertwined with laziness, further fueling a toxic cycle of productivity, guilt and anxiety.

Perhaps this experience resonates for you, too.

 

The Personal Experience of Toxic Productivity

The internal conflict between the urge to 'do' and the need to 'be' is a common struggle. On one hand, there is a drive to meet deadlines, achieve goals, and maximize every moment. On the other, there’s a longing for peace, for time spent in the present without the looming shadow of the next task. This dichotomy can lead to significant mental and emotional distress. When we're not actively producing, we might feel a pervasive sense of worthlessness or fear that we're falling behind. This can manifest in various ways: stress, burnout, irritability, and physical health issues. When this happens, we know that our productivity has become toxic.

Toxic productivity can show up in different ways: you may seem to others to really have it all together, but you may secretly be battling a constant need to outperform your last achievement. Perhaps you come across as always on top of your game, but you are sacrificing your personal life and mental health to maintain that image. And as much as you’d like to think you’ve got it under control, toxic productivity is not a solitary experience. Many people around us, regardless of their background or profession, can be impacted by our toxic productivity, as they struggle with similar feelings.

The signs of toxic productivity include restlessness and difficulty relaxing, a constant need to be busy, resistance or discomfort with boredom, feeling guilty during downtime, and an inability to enjoy leisure activities without thinking you should be working or producing something useful.

Addressing toxic productivity requires a multifaceted approach. Here are some strategies to help break free from its grip:

 

Redefine Success

Success has long been equated with constant productivity and visible achievements. However, this narrow definition overlooks the importance of personal fulfillment and well-being as measures of true success. When we expand our understanding of what it means to lead a successful life, we recognize that a balanced integration of achievement with personal satisfaction, happiness, and health is what defines true success.

Consider my client, Laurie, a C-suite executive who, after years of non-stop work, realized she was deeply unhappy despite a long list of professional accomplishments. She began to redefine success by setting goals that included spending quality time with her family, travelling to bucket list destinations, pursuing hobbies, and prioritizing her mental health. As she shifted her focus, Laurie found that she felt more content and balanced in all aspects of her life. She was surprised to discover that her productivity didn't diminish, as she had expected it would; instead, it became more meaningful as it was aligned with her broader sense of purpose and values.

By redefining success, we begin to value moments of joy and relaxation as much as we value career milestones. Wouldn’t it be great if we could feel equally fulfilled by completing a 30-minute meditation as we would by signing a new client. Radical, I know! But this shift allows us to see downtime not as wasted time, but as essential to our overall success.

Redefining success can help mitigate the anxiety associated with feeling unproductive. When we no longer see productivity as the sole measure of our worth, we free ourselves from the constant pressure to perform. This liberation can lead to a healthier, more sustainable work and personal life.

Ultimately, redefining success is about creating a life that feels meaningful and fulfilling, beyond just the narrow definition and metrics of productivity. It encourages us to celebrate our achievements in all areas of life, including those that might not traditionally be recognized, such as personal growth, relationships, and self-care.

 

Set Boundaries

Boundaries are crucial for maintaining a healthy balance between our work and personal lives. Creating clear lines that separate work time from leisure time, ensuring that one does not encroach on the other, is essential for preventing burnout and preserving mental health.

Travis, the owner of an online marketing business, and self-proclaimed king of the side hustle, used to work around the clock, often sacrificing weekends and evenings to meet client demands. He was proud of the fact that he was a workaholic, and held it as a badge of honour, until he had a medical emergency that was stress-induced. Realizing the toll this was taking on his health and relationships, Travis knew he had to start setting some firm boundaries. He adjusted his pace and communicated his specific working hours to his clients. Outside of these hours, he focused on personal activities and rest. Travis feared he might lose clients by not being constantly available to them, however, to his surprise, most clients respected his boundaries, and his productivity improved significantly during his set working hours. He felt more energized and motivated, and his creativity flourished as he gave himself permission to recharge.

In addition to time-focused boundaries, there are others to experiment with, like creating the physical space for work that is separate from areas designated for relaxation. This can be challenging, especially for those working from home, but even small changes can make a big difference. For example, using a specific desk and chair for work, not having a cell phone beside his bed to charge, and avoiding bringing work-related activities into the family room or bedroom will help us reinforce the mental and physical distinction between work and personal time.

Boundaries are not just about limiting work hours; they also protect and generate specific, intentional time for rest and leisure. By setting boundaries, we prioritize our well-being and ensure that we have the necessary space to recharge. This practice can significantly reduce the feelings of guilt associated with downtime, as we come to see it as a vital part of our overall productivity, health, and self-care.

 

Practice Mindfulness

My client, Emma, found herself constantly anxious about work. She was a rising star who believed it was her extreme level of productivity that was fuelling her success. Emma longed to be in a steady, loving relationship, but there was just no room in her life for someone else. Emma realized she needed to make some changes, and she began by incorporating some mindfulness activities into her daily routine, beginning with a simple 4-minute breathing meditation (https://youtu.be/ZM3eYRODNbc) in the morning and evening. Over time, she added short meditation sessions and mindful walks during her lunch breaks. These practices helped her feel more grounded and less overwhelmed by her to-do list. And they also helped bring her more clarity and innovation ideas. Emma was thrilled to realize that she had become even more successful by producing less.

Mindfulness involves being fully present in the moment and accepting it without judgment. It can be a powerful tool to combat toxic productivity by helping us focus on the present rather than worrying about future tasks or dwelling on past performance. Mindfulness teaches us to observe our thoughts and feelings without getting caught up in them. For instance, when we notice the feeling of guilt about not working, we can acknowledge it without letting it dictate our actions. After all, this guilty feeling is just an emotion you’re experiencing in the moment, not a directive to take action. This perspective allows us to choose a more compassionate response to ourselves and our need for rest.

Mindfulness isn’t all about sitting cross-legged and chanting ‘ohmmm’ however. We can develop the ability to be mindful and fully present right there in the thick of it! Being fully present while we’re doing tasks can improve our focus and levels of output, lead to more efficient and effective work, and reduce the overall time spent on each task, which in turn, can create more space for relaxation and leisure activities without compromising our productivity. Mindfulness enhances overall quality of life by encouraging us to savour moments of joy and relaxation, making them more fulfilling.

 

Embrace Downtime

Despite how it may feel, downtime is not a luxury; it's a necessity. Periods of rest are essential for our mental, emotional, and physical well-being. Making time to recharge and enjoy life is a true measure of success, rather than a threat to our productivity.

David, the VP of a software engineering firm, used to feel guilty every time he took a break. He was driven by the belief that constant work was the only path to success. After experiencing some early signs of burnout, David wanted to change his approach, and began an executive coaching program focused on improving his work/life balance. The simple practice of scheduling regular breaks throughout his day had a profound effect on his wellbeing. David ran with the program, and re-dedicated his weekends to rest, family, and playing sports. Over time, he noticed a significant improvement in his energy levels, personal and professional relationships, and overall job satisfaction. David was promoted to CFO shortly after and vowed to maintain this healthy balance. His commitment to protecting downtime had an ancillary effect: because he was able to model healthier behaviours for his team, the engineering firm’s corporate culture, recruiting efforts, and employee retention improved as a result.

Embracing downtime means giving ourselves permission to rest. It involves recognizing that taking a break does not make us lazy; it makes us human. Rest helps our bodies and minds recover and refuels our energy. Engaging in hobbies, spending time in nature, reading, or simply doing nothing can be valuable ways to recharge and enhance our overall sense of well-being. When we view rest as a crucial part of our productivity cycle, we can value it just as much as the work. This shift in perspective can reduce feelings of guilt and anxiety associated with rest, leading to a healthier, more balanced approach to life. Incorporating regular downtime into our schedules can also improve our relationships. When we’re not constantly preoccupied with work, we can be more present with our loved ones, fostering deeper connections and a greater sense of support and fulfillment.

 

Seek Support

Seeking support is a vital step in addressing toxic productivity. It involves reaching out to friends, family, or mental health professionals to share our experiences and gain perspective. Support systems can provide encouragement, validation, and practical advice for managing the pressures of productivity.

Talking about our feelings can be incredibly liberating. When we share our struggles, we often find that others have experienced similar issues, which can reduce the sense of isolation. Friends and family can often contribute valuable insights and support that help us navigate the pressures of productivity more effectively.

And when friends and family aren’t enough, professional support, such as therapy or coaching, can also be valuable. Mental health professionals can help us identify unhealthy patterns and develop strategies to change them. They can provide tools for managing stress, setting boundaries, and practicing self-compassion.

Support groups can also offer a sense of community and shared experience. Being part of a group where others understand our struggles can be incredibly validating and empowering, as members share practical tips and encouragement for making positive changes.

Consider Maria, a marketing director at a highly successful agency who felt overwhelmed by her workload. During coaching discussions, we discovered that her anxiety response was far beyond the scope of what can be managed through coaching alone, so I encouraged her to seek out a therapist. Through therapy, Maria learned some critical coping strategies that helped her manage her significant anxiety, and through coaching, she learned to set and hold healthier boundaries. She also joined a support group for women who were facing similar challenges, which provided a sense of community and shared understanding. This three-pronged approach to support made a tremendous difference to Maria’s quality of life.

Seeking support can transform our relationship with productivity by helping us recognize that we don’t have to face these challenges alone. It can provide the reassurance and tools we need to prioritize our well-being and redefine our approach to work and rest.

 

Cultivate Self-Compassion

When we’re in the throes of toxic productivity, self-compassion rarely gets a seat at the table – striving and critical self-judgment take up all the space. But cultivating self-compassion is a powerful antidote to the toxic cycle: treating ourselves with the same kindness and understanding that we would offer to a friend means that we recognize and tolerate our imperfections and struggles, without the guilt-inducing layers of harsh judgment.

Take the example of James, a writer who often berated himself for not meeting aggressive, self-imposed deadlines. His inner critic was relentless, leaving him feeling inadequate, and leading to signs of burnout. After learning about self-compassion as part of his assigned coaching practices, James started speaking to himself differently; with kindness and compassion; with patience, acknowledging his efforts, even when he didn’t meet his goals. This shift in mindset helped him feel more at peace and less stressed.

Self-compassion involves recognizing that everyone makes mistakes and experiences setbacks. It’s about understanding that these moments are part of being human, not signs of failure. Cultivating self-compassion changes the way we view productivity. Instead of seeing it as a measure of our worth, we can see it simply as one aspect of our lives, which reduces the pressure to constantly perform and produce.

Ultimately, self-compassion can help us build a more positive relationship with ourselves. It encourages us to celebrate our efforts and achievements, no matter how small, to be gentle with ourselves when we fall short, and to examine our personal definition of success.

Remember, in the midst of all of the doing, it’s okay to just be. Embrace the present moment and embrace rest as a vital part of a successful, fulfilling and balanced life.

MICROMANAGER DETOX: The Career-Killing Habit You Need to Break Now

Leslie Rohonczy, IMC™, PCC, Executive Coach, Leadership Expert, Speaker, Author

In my work as an executive coach, I've encountered numerous leaders and teams who are grappling with the pitfalls of micromanagement. Recently, I worked with three different leaders whose micromanaging style highlighted the pervasive nature and detrimental effects of this derailing leadership behaviour.

 My first client, an ambitious manager, was bright, capable, experienced, and determined. After finding himself passed over repeatedly for a promotion, with no good explanation as to why, he was desperate. Despite  his stellar operational expertise and experience, the inability to relinquish control over minor operational details stifled his team's growth, created poor employee satisfaction scores, and undermined his leadership potential.

 The second client faced a different challenge. His micromanagement instinct stemmed from a deep-seated inability to trust his employees. This lack of trust wasn't due to any inherent untrustworthiness in his team; rather, it was his failure to invest time in building meaningful relationships with them. His need for control created a barrier that prevented the development of trust and intimacy so essential for high-functioning teams.

 The third client, a newly promoted senior leader, struggled under the weight of her own leader's micromanaging style. Despite her new executive role, my client’s boss continually overstepped into her sandbox, making decisions on her behalf, and undermining her authority in the presence of other executives. This not only made her feel untrusted and incapable, but also prevented her from growing into her new responsibilities and taking up her full leadership space with her team, peers, and the Board of Directors.

RECOGNIZING THE SIGNS OF MICROMANAGEMENT

 Micromanagement can create an unhealthy work environment by stifling employee growth, reducing productivity, and preventing individuals from performing at their best. By identifying micromanagement tendencies early, you can adopt healthier leadership practices before the situation deteriorates.

 Here are some signs that you might be micromanaging. As you read each one, ask yourself, “Do I do this?”

  1. Constant Oversight: You find yourself frequently checking in on your team's work, even when they haven't asked for feedback. You often involve yourself in minor project details that your team should handle independently. You notice that your hovering creates tension in your employees.

  2. Resistance To or Difficulty Delegating: You take on most responsibilities yourself, even when your team is fully capable. You are reluctant to delegate tasks, fearing they will fail without your direct involvement. You see how hard employees are working, and feel you’d be burdening them, so you do it yourself instead.

  3. Lack of Trust: You require employees to check in with you before making every decision, and you insist on approving all project deliverables before they proceed.

  4. Perfectionism: You have high standards and expect output from employees to be perfectly executed. You strive to control every aspect of your team's work. You feel anxious when tasks are not done exactly your way.

  5. Focus on Minor Details: You concentrate more on correcting insignificant details rather than focusing on strategic goals and opportunities, solving critical issues facing the team, or fostering employee development. Sometimes, you miss the big picture because you are focused on the minor details.

  6. Taking Over Tasks: When you spot a mistake, you prefer to fix it yourself instead of allowing the employee to correct it and learn from the experience. You insert yourself in certain tasks that you enjoy, even though your team is fully capable and expected to deliver on them.

  7. Discouraging Independence: You want to be informed about every move your team makes, no matter how trivial. You discourage independent thinking, new ways of working, or creative experimentation. You don’t appreciate it when employees express opinions that challenge your own.

  8. Overworking: Believing you are the most capable person for the job, you often work overtime to rectify others' mistakes and ensure everything is perfect. You can’t shut off work at the end of the day. You expect employees to respond to your emails in the evenings and on weekends.

 

If you're still uncertain about whether you're micromanaging, seek feedback from your employees. An anonymous survey can provide an honest assessment of your level of involvement. While this feedback may be hard to hear, it's essential to listen to your team's input and take action to address your micromanagement habits.

 

 MICROMANAGER SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL

 Self-assessment can provide valuable insights into your management style and highlight areas for improvement. By reflecting on your behavior and assessing your tendencies, you can gauge the level of micromanagement that feels natural to you and determine how it affects your team.

 This self-diagnosis tool is designed to help you evaluate your management style objectively. Consider the following questions and rate yourself on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 represents "hands-off" and 5 signifies "micromanager." Reflect on your typical behaviors and interactions with your team to get an accurate assessment.

 Remember, this exercise aims to foster self-awareness and promote healthy leadership practices.

  1. How often do you check in on your team’s progress?

    • (1: Occasionally, 3: Often, 5: Constantly)

  2. How comfortable are you with delegating important tasks?

    • (1: Very comfortable, 3: Somewhat comfortable, 5: Very uncomfortable)

  3. Do you feel the need to review and edit the work your team produces?

    • (1: Rarely, 3: Sometimes, 5: Almost always)

  4. How often do you provide detailed instructions on how to do tasks?

    • (1: Rarely, 3: Sometimes, 5: Regularly)

  5. How frequently do you override decisions made by your team?

    • (1: Seldom, 3: Sometimes, 5: Very frequently)

 INTERPRETING YOUR SCORE

After rating yourself, analyze your scores to understand your micromanagement tendencies better. High total scores (19-25) suggest that you are likely to have micromanaging behaviours, while lower scores (5-11) indicate a less controlling, more hands-off approach. Moderate scores (12-18) can suggest a balanced approach but may also hint at areas where you could improve your delegation and trust in your team.

 If you find that your scores are at the higher end of the scale, reflect on the potential reasons that are likely driving these behaviors. Are you struggling to trust your team's capabilities? Do you have a perfectionist streak that drives you to control every detail? Recognizing these patterns is the first step towards adopting a more empowering leadership style.

 To further refine your self-awareness, solicit feedback from your team in the form of an anonymous survey. This can provide you with insights into how your management style affects your employees. While this feedback may be difficult to hear, it’s a valuable tool for identifying areas where you can curb your micromanagement tendencies and develop a healthier, more productive work environment.

 

8 IMPACTS OF MICROMANAGING

The ‘habit’ of micromanagement can damage your team, organization, and career. Here are the eight major impacts of micromanagement:

 

IMPACT 1: LOSS OF CONTROL

Ironically, micromanagement often results in losing the very control you're trying to maintain. By relying solely on control as your management tool, you limit your flexibility and effectiveness. Instead of gaining control over your team and projects, you end up losing it, along with valuable time. Different management styles can be effective with different staff members, and excessively controlling behaviors will not only diminish your ability to adapt and communicate effectively as an effective leader; it will demotivate certain employees.

Takeaway: Over-relying on control narrows your management style, ultimately reducing your capacity to manage and communicate effectively.

 

IMPACT 2: LOSS OF TRUST

Micromanagement erodes trust between you and your team. When employees feel micromanaged, they view you not as a supportive leader but as a control freak. This leads to a breakdown of trust, which can drastically reduce productivity and can cause your best performers to leave. Trust is a two-way street; your team needs to trust you just as much as you trust them.

Takeaway: Micromanagement destroys trust, which affects employee engagement, output, and retention.

 

IMPACT 3: DEPENDENT EMPLOYEES

Micromanaged employees become overly dependent on your guidance and approval. This dependency stifles their confidence and initiative, making them less capable of performing tasks independently. This not only takes a toll on your time and energy as a leader, but it also wastes the unique skills and talents that each employee brings to the table. When employees are allowed to think independently, innovation and great achievements are possible.

Takeaway: Micromanagement fosters dependency, and radically diminishing the unique contributions and growth of your employees.

 

IMPACT 4: MANAGER & EMPLOYEE BURNOUT

As a leader who constantly oversees every detail of your team’s work, this exhausting and unsustainable level of micromanagement can quickly lead to burnout, affecting both your professional and personal life. Burnout can cause you to become disillusioned with your job, potentially leading to departure from your role (voluntary or not!) and can also lead to wider disengagement and stress across your team as a result. Employees who feel micromanaged often experience low morale and reduced job satisfaction, leading to burnout and disengagement.

Takeaway: Micromanagement not only harms your employees but also poses a significant risk to your own mental and physical health.

 

IMPACT 5: HIGH TURNOVER OF STAFF

Most people find micromanagement unbearable and will eventually leave. You may feel that you have valid reasons for the urge to micromanage your employees (ego, insecurity, or inexperience, for example). But none of these justifies the misery of this particular employee experience, not to mention the high turnover rates it causes. Constantly having to train new staff is costly, and disrupts team momentum and morale, resulting in the loss of skilled employees and a decline in overall team performance. It can also make it difficult to attract top talent, as word spreads about the controlling work environment.

Takeaway: Micromanagement leads to high staff turnover, costing your organization valuable talent and stability.

 

IMPACT 6: LACK OF AUTONOMY

Micromanagement strips employees of their autonomy, which is one of the basic human needs. This loss of autonomy creates a drop in motivation and can lead employees to do only the bare minimum. When employees feel they lack control over their work, they become disengaged and are unlikely to go beyond what is demanded of them. Conversely, granting autonomy empowers employees, fostering pride, engagement, and initiative in their work.

Takeaway: Lack of autonomy stifles employee growth and motivation, preventing them from taking ownership of their work.

 

IMPACT 7: LACK OF INNOVATION

One of the most significant dangers of micromanagement is the suppression of creativity and innovation. Your employees are closest to the work, and that means they often have incredibly valuable insights into your customers’ needs, potential innovations and products to meet those needs, and how to improve processes to make work more efficient. By micromanaging, you stifle their ability to innovate and take risks, which can halt progress and prevent good ideas from surfacing.

Takeaway: Micromanagement crushes innovation, hindering progress, and limits the potential for creative solutions.

  

IMPACT 8: THE BOTTOM LINE: Stifled creativity and innovation, low autonomy and trust, decreased productivity and inefficiencies, and high turnover due to micromanagement will directly affect your bottom line and can result in missed opportunities because employees may be hesitant to take initiative.

Takeaway: There’s a quantifiable measure of the impact of micromanagement: drop in revenue, innovation, efficiency, employee satisfaction and retention.

 

THE STRATEGIC SHIFT FOR HIGH-LEVEL LEADERS

As leaders advance in their careers, it becomes increasingly important to shift from a focus on day-to-day operations to a more strategic perspective. This transition is vital for several reasons:

  • Long-Term Vision: Higher-level leaders need to focus on the long-term goals and vision of the organization. This requires stepping back from the minutiae to see the bigger picture, and creating an inspiring connection between those big, bold goals and the workers who will help the company achieve them.

  • Empowering Teams: By stepping away from the details, leaders can empower their teams to take ownership and responsibility for their work. This fosters a culture of trust and autonomy – two elements of high-performing teams.

  • Innovative Thinking: Strategic leaders are better positioned to drive innovation and change, identify trends, anticipate challenges, and develop solutions that align with the organization’s goals. Micromanaging leaders are missing this strategic aspect of the role.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR OVERCOMING THE MICROMANAGEMENT INSTINCT

 Now that you've identified your micromanagement tendencies, it's crucial to take proactive steps to shift towards a more empowering management style. Here are ten actionable recommendations, supplemented with insights from Gallup research and best practices:

 

Nurture Trusting Relationships: Building trust within your team is essential for fostering autonomy and productivity. Trust empowers employees to take ownership of their work and move projects forward without constant oversight. Providing constructive feedback reinforces this trust and encourages a growth-oriented mindset.

 Perfect Isn’t Perfect: Acknowledge that perfectionism often drives micromanagement and inhibits innovation. Understand that there are multiple paths to success, and minor details are not always critical. Encourage experimentation and embrace failure (I prefer to call it ‘unintended results’) as opportunities for growth and learning.

 Encourage Learning and Experimentation: Give your team the autonomy to experiment and innovate. Adopt a fail-forward mindset, where mistakes are viewed as valuable learning experiences. Provide guidance and support, intervening only when necessary to address recurring issues.

 Set Expectations: Establish clear expectations for your team upfront, including project objectives, timelines, and success metrics. Clear communication reduces the need for micromanagement by ensuring everyone understands their roles, responsibilities, and deliverables.

 Delegate Like a Boss: Effective delegation is crucial for empowering your team and freeing up your time for strategic priorities. Assign tasks based on individual strengths and development goals, providing necessary resources and authority. Remember, effective delegation generates higher revenue and boosts employee morale.

 Stay In Your Leadership Lane: Prioritize tasks that leverage your unique skills and expertise, such as goal-setting and strategic planning. Delegate operational tasks to your team, allowing them to take ownership of their roles and contribute to organizational success. Ensure decisions are made at the right level, and push decision-making accountability down whenever possible.

 Embrace Transparency: Utilize project management tools to monitor project progress without micromanaging. These tools provide visibility into individual tasks, enabling you to identify issues early and intervene as needed. Foster open communication about progress, challenges, and collaboration to build trust and accountability.

 Hire Well: Invest in hiring the right people for your team. Hiring individuals with the right skills and qualifications minimizes the need for micromanagement and fosters a culture of autonomy and accountability. Take the time to understand each employee's preferences and strengths to tailor your management approach accordingly.

 Seek Feedback from Your Team: Engage in open dialogue with your team to understand their preferred communication styles and preferences. Respect their opinions and perspectives and adjust your communication style to each individual. By actively listening to your team, you demonstrate trust and respect, and your commitment to growing strong relationships with each employee.

 Practice Self-Compassion: Recognize that transitioning from micromanagement to a hands-off leadership style is a journey that requires patience and self-compassion. Be open to self-observation, to learning from mistakes, and to continuously improving your leadership skills. Cultivate a growth mindset and celebrate progress, both for yourself and your team.

 

COACHING PRACTICES TO COMBAT MICROMANAGEMENT

  • Reflective Journaling: Keep a journal to reflect on your management behaviors and identify patterns. Note situations where you felt the urge to micromanage and explore what was driving that urge. Look for themes. Explore how your micromanaging reflex is about you, rather than about your employees or the tasks.

  • Mindfulness Practices: Engage in mindfulness exercises to stay present when your micromanager becomes activated by the thought of relinquishing control. This can help reduce the anxiety you feel and allow you to dial down the need to overcontrol.

  • Accountability Partner: Work with a coach who can help you understand your motivations, and help you build the muscles to hold yourself accountable, by providing valuable perspectives, observations and objective feedback about your leadership approach.

  • Training and Development: Invest in leadership training programs that emphasize delegation, trust-building, and strategic thinking.

BAG OF STONES Practice

By LESLIE ROHONCZY, Executive Coach (PCC), Integral Master Coach (IMC); Author of Coaching Life: Navigating Life’s Most Common Coaching Topics


PRACTICE: ‘BAG OF STONES’

When we experience overwhelm, it can feel like we’re carrying the weight of the world on our back. I wrote ‘Bag of Stones’ (see video below), as a powerful coaching practice to help us navigate our overwhelm and figure out how to lighten our load. Give this guided visualization a try, to help you identify what’s most important to you, what you no longer find useful, and what you can let go of. You’ll need a pen and your journal to answer the following questions:

Imagine you are a traveler walking along a path, and you’re wearing a large backpack. It’s uncomfortably heavy, and the longer you wear it, the more your back aches. You know it’s time to lighten your load, so you place it on the ground, open the top, and inside you discover three bags. The first one is made of the finest silk; the second is made of sturdy cotton, and the third is made of old burlap.

1.       You open the silk bag and discover that it contains riches beyond your wildest dreams: diamonds, rubies, and emeralds. These precious items represent the things that are most important in your life; things that fill you up and make you feel nourished, grounded, connected, and fulfilled. For me, these are my family, my music collaboration, and my creativity. What are your treasures? Name them, and then imagine repacking each precious item one at a time, pausing to deeply feel gratitude for each one before you place it back in the silk bag. Imagine placing the silk bag back into your backpack to bring along with you.

2.       You open the second bag and discover that it contains many smooth stones that have been polished by time. These represent the things that may have been useful in the past, but no longer serve you anymore. However, they may be valuable for somebody else who is not as far along the path as you are. For me, it was striving for career achievement. I’m done with this kind of striving, but it could be useful to someone at the beginning of their career who is trying to make their mark in the world. What stones are you ‘done’ with? Name them, and then visualize yourself leaving them at the side of the road to offer to another traveler. Visualize placing the empty cotton bag back in your backpack.

3.       You open the burlap bag, and discover it’s full of dirty, jagged rocks that represent your limiting beliefs, bad habits, unproductive behaviors, negative or painful experiences, self-judgment, and unhealthy relationships that you don’t need to carry around anymore. These rocks just create pain that distracts you from the true treasures in your life. What do your jagged rocks represent? Name each one, and then visualize throwing them over a nearby cliff, one by one. Place the empty burlap bag back in your backpack. Then strap this lighter backpack on your back and continue your journey, feeling a sense of lightness in your body and spirit.